Aside from the New Testament, and aside from classical works that Christian copiests may have edited, there is the Talmud. All of the Talmudic references to Jesus were censored when the Talmud was printed in Christian lands, and most of the references to Jesus in the Talmud are anti-Christian polemics, but in tractate Avoda Zara, 16b:15 through 17a:3, there is a passage that (if you find an un-censored version -- the Sefaria web site has it) describes the encounter between a Rabbi Eliezer and one Ya'akov (Jacob) of Kefar Sekhania, a follower of Jesus. As a result of this encounter, Eliezer was arrested and charged with heresy (probably charged with being a Christian). This story must have taken place not too long before the Bar Kokhba revolt (the year 132), and Eliezer recounts a teaching of Jesus told to him by Ya'akov. This teaching is not in the New Testament, but does not contradict the Jesus we know from there, and it has been passed down to us through a community outside of and opposed to Christianity.
historical evidence suggests this theory. The war was Historical.
It isn’t sure they did. In fact, new historical evidence points to the possibility that they lived with them. They had a village down river from the colony and recent historical evidence has found English items in the village and evidence they were living with them.
These historical documents are of extreme importance.This is a historical site.
There is no historical evidence that she was mean spirited.
Dinosaurs appeared on the earth before Jesus according to the present evidence.
The Bible is more than a historical document. It is the very Word of God, and as such, what need have we of further evidence and stories of Jesus?
The historical records of the time in other histories. Such as Roman history. Also other historical books such as the bible. Jesus of Nazareth was mentioned by the Jewish historian Josephus in his writings.
No, there is no historical or biblical evidence to suggest that Jesus had a twin brother. The concept of Jesus having a twin brother is not supported by mainstream Christian beliefs.
google.com
The notion of Jesus fathering a son is just faniciful speculation that has no biblical or historical basis. There is no evidence that he did have a child but there is also no eveidence that he did not.
There are texts from some non-Christian historians (and others), such as Josephus and Tacitus. For more details, check the Wikipedia article entitled "Historicity of Jesus". ---------- There is no contemporary evidence that Jesus was a real, historical person. Later authors, such as Josephus and Tacitus described the Christians who worshipped Jesus, but make no attempt to vouch for his historicity.
There is no historical evidence that that ever happened, other than through His followers. It's as unsupported as saying Jesus manifested Himself to the Americas to start mormonism.
The Quest of the Historical Jesus was created in 1910.
There is a great deal of what is termed "hearsay" evidence, from others. However, since Jesus was not known to have written anything down, and since the historians of his time do not mention him, we have only the circular reasoning of his apostles, especially Paul (who admits to having never met him), that he existed. Even the writings of Josephus, who was thought to have made a reference to Jesus, are now accepted, by the vast majority of scholars, to have been interpolated (meaning that these references were only inserted into the writings of Josephus at a much later date. There is no historical evidence that Jesus of Nazareth really did exist. None of his contemporaries mentioned him - not even Philo of Alexandria, who could be expected to have mentioned Jesus if he had known of him. And nothing occurred, whether in Rome, Palestine or elsewhere, as a direct result of the existence of Jesus. Here, we have to accept that absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Based on our present knowledge, there is no reason to conclude that Jesus did not exist.
Josephus, a Jewish historian from the first century, mentions Jesus in his work "Antiquities of the Jews." This mention provides extra-biblical, historical evidence of Jesus' existence, which is important for scholars and researchers studying the historical Jesus. While there is some debate over the authenticity of the specific mention of Jesus in Josephus' writings, it is still an important piece of historical documentation.
None. It only offers hope for every person. Jesus is a historical character who did truly resurrect, which gives every one hope and the only logical solution to the meaning of life. There is more historical evidence that Jesus existed, than there is for Julius Caesar. He is the way the truth and the life and only in him we can find eternal satisfaction.
It is not accurate or appropriate to make assumptions about Jesus being gay. There is no historical evidence or biblical teachings to support this claim. Jesus' teachings focus on love, compassion, and acceptance of all individuals, regardless of their sexual orientation.