Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)
Ernesto Arturo Miranda was arrested in 1963, but his case, Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966), wasn't heard in the US Supreme Court until 1966.
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
The Miranda decision mandated advising suspects of their right to legal counsel and their right to remain silent during interrogation, protecting their 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination. If a suspect does not respond that he understands his rights, as when a foreign language is involved, no further interrogation is legally admissible until he responds in the affirmative and waives his right to counsel.
Ernesto Miranda. (He is the Plaintiff in the Supreme Court.) He was accused of Kidnapping,Robbery,and Rape. All of which he had done,but when the police did not read him his Rights,now known as the "Miranda Rights," he did not do time for the crimes he had committed.
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
1966
Miranda v. Arizona
5-4 miranda wins
Miranda v. Arizona.
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)
No.
1966
Miranda v. Arizona
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)Ernesto Miranda was the plaintiff; the state of Arizona was the defendant. In a court case, the plaintiff/petitioner's name is always listed first, and the defendant/respondent's name is listed last.
(1966) *Rights of the Accused
Miranda v. Arizona
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)The Supreme Court case referred to as Miranda v. Arizonais actually four different lower court cases that were consolidated for hearing in the Supreme Court. Mr. Miranda himself was arrested in Phoenix, Arizona. The other three included two state cases from California and New York, and one federal case against the United States.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Miranda v. Arizona