Creationism is the belief that the account of the origin of things given in The Bible is the exact and literal truth.
Creationism, as a belief, a philosophy and a mindset, would be defined as an abstract noun; creationism as an event or a process would be a concrete noun. Nouns have no opposites; you cannot get "negative-creation" in the same way as you can get 1 and -1.
According to Wikipedia, Creationism is the religious belief that humanity, life, the Earth, and the universe were created in their original form by a deity (often the Abrahamic God of Judaism, Christianity and Islam) or deities.Initially, Creationism developed as a response by a minority of Christians to the Theory of Evolution. Its advocates attempted to have Creationism taught, in US schools, in science classes as a valid alternative to evolution. The courts blocked this attempt, on the grounds that Creationism is a topic of religion and to teach it in science classes would breach the separation of church and state.For more information, please visit: http://christianity.answers.com/theology/the-story-of-creation
Evolution is a scientific theory explaining the diversity of modern life. The various forms of creationism are religious beliefs, usually inspired by ancient myths captured in religious scriptures.
Evolution does NOT involve creationism.Evolution is a testable and therefore provable explanation as to how the diversity of life on earth has happened.Creationism is a religious viewpoint and therefore a mater of faith.AnswerI agree with the above. Evolution does NOT involve Creationism. Evolution is a branch of biological science and thus rejects "supernatural" claims such as those of Creationism, does not need to consider them. Creationism, often hanging on Genesis, the first book of the Bible, predates scientific inquiry and the scientific method and so is thus rejected by science and thus evolutionary science. In the public spotlight, the so-called Evolution-Creation "controversy" and all the on-stage arguments and debates might make it seem as though Evolution and Creationism (and Intelligent Design) have a lot to do with one another, but I doubt Creationism gets much mention at all in scientific laboratories and scientific conferences (it can't because it hasn't got anything to say about the real world.)
Most certainly not side-by-side. That would imply that they are equivalent notions. Evolution, however, is a scientific theory, and creationism is religious myth. Evolution belongs in biology classes, creationism in something like comparative religion courses.
Answer By definition creationism is theistic.
Technically, there is no such thing as scientific creationism. Creationism is per definition un- or even anti-scientific.
The ISBN of Creationism's Trojan Horse is 0195157427.
The scientific view on creationism is that there is no scientific evidence supporting it.
Fiat Creationism
Creationism's Trojan Horse has 416 pages.
Creationism's Trojan Horse was created on 2004-01-08.
No.
In Focus - 2009 Creationism was released on: USA: 10 December 2012
Thomas Aquinas believed that creationism, the belief that God directly created the world and all its inhabitants, was compatible with reason. He argued that the existence of a creator was necessary to explain the order and design in the universe, and considered the idea of divine creation to be a fundamental aspect of Christian theology. Aquinas's philosophy stressed the importance of both faith and reason in understanding the world.
Creationism is the basis of all religions, it is what science says is not true. Teaching it in a public school is illegal.
Creationism, as a belief, a philosophy and a mindset, would be defined as an abstract noun; creationism as an event or a process would be a concrete noun. Nouns have no opposites; you cannot get "negative-creation" in the same way as you can get 1 and -1.