answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

liquidated damages are agreed amount of money in case something goes wrong in the fulfilment o f a contract while limited liability is liability to certain amount in case of things go wrong

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What is the difference between limited liability and liquidated damages?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is the difference between Non Trucking Liability insurance and Bobtail Insurance?

your not covered for damages


How does one get compensation for liquidated damages?

In order to receive compensation for liquidated damages, a person would have to hire an attorney and go to court. If the damages or losses were proven, the person could be compensated for them.


Loss of profit is not an example of liquidated damages?

NO


Are liquidated damages clauses enforcible under Arizona law?

A liquidated damages clause is usually enforceable under Arizona law, depending on the type of contract involved. For example, Arizona code section 10-2016 allows such damages in a marketing contract. In general, liquidated damages are allowed where damages are hard to predict and quantify.


What is the meaning of liquidated damage as an insurance term?

Liquidated damages refers to an amount of money designated and agreed to in advance for damages, before any loss takes place, so that the actual damages need not be calculated.


What is the difference between liability insurance and full coverage?

Liability insurance pays for someone else's damages if an accident is your fault but won't cover your vehicle. Full coverage provides liability insurance as above but will also cover your damages to your own vehicle in an accident regardless of whose at fault, as well as theft, fire, etc.


Tortious liability arises from the breach of a duty primarily fixed by law this duty is towards persons generally and its breach is redressible by an action for un liquidated damages who said this?

Professor P.H. Winfield


Temloc Ltd v Errill Properties Ltd 1987?

The judgment in Temloc v Erril confirmed that where "Nil" is entered as the value of a liquidated damages clause this will be the only remedy available to the employer where works are not completed on time, i.e. he will be entitled to £0 in liquidated damages and will also be unable to claim unliquated damages at common law for breach of contract. Where an employer does not want to use the liquidated damages clause but wishes to keep available his remedy at common law the liquidated damages clause should be deleted.


What is the difference between general damages and special damages?

How are ordinary damages are different from special damages


Are liquidated damages the same as Punitive damages?

No. Punitive damages are strictly that--punitive, designed to punish and make an example of the defendant to deter future similar bad conduct. Conversely, liquidated damages are set damages (i.e. per day, hour, whatever increment of time) as a penalty for non-performance. Perfect example would be a contractor who promises to finish building a house by January 30th and the contract says for each day past January 30th, the homeowner shall be entitled to liquidated damages in the amount of $100.


What are liquidated damages?

Liquidated means the amount is determined or can be readily calculated (adding interest or penalties, for example). In rare cases, a contract may specify damages in the event of a breach or there may be a statute allowing an amount certain for violations pursued in a private cause of action.


What are the different between tortious liability and contractual liability?

There is more freedom in contractual law where as in tortuous liability it is more of imposed nature. The claimant will receive compensation for damages and expected earnings in the case of contract liability where as the claimant can only claim damages as in the case of tortuous liability. There is more privacy in the contract in the case of contractual liabilities as the parties who are involved in the contract are the one who can actually sue for damages as in the case of ATKIN V SOUNDERS(1942) whereas in tortuous liabilities any one as a third party who had suffered losses or damages can claim compensation from the defendant.