Punishment meted by legal authorities is generally not considered abuse if due process has been administered first. Abuse is usually at the whim of the abuser. However, if one is innocent but convicted, punishment will doubtless not only feel like abuse, but in fact, be abuse. This is a difficult situation always. DNA testing has helped free innocent people and save them from further punishment/abuse. It has also helped convict guilty people so that proper, government sanctioned punishment can be meted out. Then again, chimerical persons may complicate the DNA picture considerably, but so far they have proven to be quite rare.
does tess deserve final punishment
Criminals are wicked and deserve punishment because they loot and steal what does not belong to them. They deserve punishment because they discourage investors from investing in a given area.
A colloquial, but pretty good, definition has it as "not getting what you deserve." The implication being that you deserve punishment, but that punishment is waived.
if you have to ask this, then you don't deserve an answer
yes
i say a deserved punishment is to guand them for at least two weeks
yes
yes
If you don't know the difference between "their" and "there," do you honestly think you deserve an answer?
criminals are wicked in my views
Favour is what you dont deserve but you get and grace is Mercy shown to all man
Legally, no. They deserve punishment.