Procedural justice is the process leading up to an outcome (use of organizational resources). Distributive justice is how organization resources are allocated.
Here is an example for getting a bonus at work
Procedural Justice
If you do A, B, and C you will get a bonus.
Distributive Justice
You did A, B, and C, here is your bonus
Distributive Injustice
You did A, B, and C, but you're not getting a bonus.
Substantive justice is referred to as the content or substance of the decision and involves normative principles, such as equality need, desert and rights. However distributive justice is how we consider the ethics of how political and econmic goods and benefits are distributed.
Distribtutive justice can be challenged in depth as there are many opposing views, for example, whether it should be based on desert, merit, human rights, needs or utlilty.
Substantive justice is hard to argue against as its sole purpose is to make sure everything is equal, however some peoples needs and wants may be confused depending on how rich or poor people are.
A process view of distributive justice focuses on the fairness of procedures and decision-making processes in distributing resources or opportunities, while an end state view focuses on the fairness of the ultimate outcome or distribution of resources or opportunities. The process view emphasizes fair procedures regardless of the outcome, whereas the end state view prioritizes fair outcomes regardless of the process.
Distributive justice focuses on the perceived fairness of outcomes, while procedural justice focuses on the fairness of the process by which decisions are made. In designing pay systems, countries that value distributive justice may prioritize equal pay for equal work, while those that emphasize procedural justice may focus on transparency and employee involvement in pay decisions. Socio-cultural norms and values will also influence how these principles are applied in different countries.
Julian Lamont has written: 'Distributive justice' -- subject(s): Distributive justice
distributive justice
Carl Knight has written: 'Responsibility and distributive justice' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Responsibility, Distributive justice, Political science
Aristotle identified four divisions of justice: distributive justice, which concerns the fair distribution of resources and rewards; commutative justice, which focuses on fair exchanges between individuals; legal justice, which involves obeying the laws of the land; and corrective justice, which deals with rectifying wrongs and restoring balance after injustices have occurred.
Distributive justice in organizational behavior is a type of organizational justice that focuses on a person's perception that they have received fair compensation for their work (i.e. pay, recognition, better assignments, etc.)
Distributive justice is the most relevant to the tension between America's and China's interests in the ocean's supplies of oil and gas.
Manfred Hassebrauck has written: 'Emotionale Konsequenzen distributiver Ungerechtigkeit' -- subject(s): Distributive justice, Equality, Psychological aspects, Psychological aspects of Distributive justice, Psychological aspects of Equality, Psychological aspects of Social justice, Social justice
Retributive justice: focusing on punishment for wrongdoings based on the severity of the offense. Distributive justice: concerned with fair allocation of resources and opportunities in society. Restorative justice: emphasizing repairing harm caused by a crime through reconciliation between victims and offenders.
Robert Nozick and John Rawls are both influential political philosophers who have differing views on justice. Nozick is a proponent of libertarianism, which prioritizes individual rights and minimal government intervention. Rawls, on the other hand, argues for a form of distributive justice that aims to reduce inequality through principles such as the difference principle. While Nozick is more concerned with procedural justice and individual rights, Rawls focuses on outcomes and social justice.
W. King Mott has written: 'The third way' -- subject(s): Catholic Church, Distributive justice, Political and social views, Religious aspects, Religious aspects of Distributive justice