0
What is the role of the consuls and when a dictator could be appointed?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
The consuls could loosely be likened to present day prime ministers, but with more power as they were not restricted by a legislature. They were also the chief generals of the army. However there were times when the consuls and senate could not agree on a course of action, and that's when a dictator would be appointed to settle some matter, which was usually a military one.
The consuls could loosely be likened to present day prime ministers, but with more power as they were not restricted by a legislature. They were also the chief generals of the army. However there were times when the consuls and senate could not agree on a course of action, and that's when a dictator would be appointed to settle some matter, which was usually a military one.
The consuls could loosely be likened to present day prime ministers, but with more power as they were not restricted by a legislature. They were also the chief generals of the army. However there were times when the consuls and senate could not agree on a course of action, and that's when a dictator would be appointed to settle some matter, which was usually a military one.
The consuls could loosely be likened to present day prime ministers, but with more power as they were not restricted by a legislature. They were also the chief generals of the army. However there were times when the consuls and senate could not agree on a course of action, and that's when a dictator would be appointed to settle some matter, which was usually a military one.
The consuls could loosely be likened to present day prime ministers, but with more power as they were not restricted by a legislature. They were also the chief generals of the army. However there were times when the consuls and senate could not agree on a course of action, and that's when a dictator would be appointed to settle some matter, which was usually a military one.
The consuls could loosely be likened to present day prime ministers, but with more power as they were not restricted by a legislature. They were also the chief generals of the army. However there were times when the consuls and senate could not agree on a course of action, and that's when a dictator would be appointed to settle some matter, which was usually a military one.
The consuls could loosely be likened to present day prime ministers, but with more power as they were not restricted by a legislature. They were also the chief generals of the army. However there were times when the consuls and senate could not agree on a course of action, and that's when a dictator would be appointed to settle some matter, which was usually a military one.
The consuls could loosely be likened to present day prime ministers, but with more power as they were not restricted by a legislature. They were also the chief generals of the army. However there were times when the consuls and senate could not agree on a course of action, and that's when a dictator would be appointed to settle some matter, which was usually a military one.
The consuls could loosely be likened to present day prime ministers, but with more power as they were not restricted by a legislature. They were also the chief generals of the army. However there were times when the consuls and senate could not agree on a course of action, and that's when a dictator would be appointed to settle some matter, which was usually a military one.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Wiki User
∙ 11y agoThe consuls could loosely be likened to present day prime ministers, but with more power as they were not restricted by a legislature. They were also the chief generals of the army. However there were times when the consuls and senate could not agree on a course of action, and that's when a dictator would be appointed to settle some matter, which was usually a military one.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the role of a dictator during the Roman Republic?
A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.A dictator was a sole ruler appointed by the senate in times of crises when the senate could not agree on an action to solve the problem. The dictator was usually appointed for a period of six months but his term could be renewed if he needed more time to get results. He was expected to resign the dictatorship as soon as his job was done.
What was a role of a dictator during the roman republic?
During the Roman republic, a dictator was an appointed office for usually a six month period. In that time, the dictator was supposed to take charge of the government and solve whatever problem that caused him to be appointed in the first place. The time of the office could be extended and many times it was, culminating in the perpetual dictatorship of Julius Caesar.During the Roman republic, a dictator was an appointed office for usually a six month period. In that time, the dictator was supposed to take charge of the government and solve whatever problem that caused him to be appointed in the first place. The time of the office could be extended and many times it was, culminating in the perpetual dictatorship of Julius Caesar.During the Roman republic, a dictator was an appointed office for usually a six month period. In that time, the dictator was supposed to take charge of the government and solve whatever problem that caused him to be appointed in the first place. The time of the office could be extended and many times it was, culminating in the perpetual dictatorship of Julius Caesar.During the Roman republic, a dictator was an appointed office for usually a six month period. In that time, the dictator was supposed to take charge of the government and solve whatever problem that caused him to be appointed in the first place. The time of the office could be extended and many times it was, culminating in the perpetual dictatorship of Julius Caesar.During the Roman republic, a dictator was an appointed office for usually a six month period. In that time, the dictator was supposed to take charge of the government and solve whatever problem that caused him to be appointed in the first place. The time of the office could be extended and many times it was, culminating in the perpetual dictatorship of Julius Caesar.During the Roman republic, a dictator was an appointed office for usually a six month period. In that time, the dictator was supposed to take charge of the government and solve whatever problem that caused him to be appointed in the first place. The time of the office could be extended and many times it was, culminating in the perpetual dictatorship of Julius Caesar.During the Roman republic, a dictator was an appointed office for usually a six month period. In that time, the dictator was supposed to take charge of the government and solve whatever problem that caused him to be appointed in the first place. The time of the office could be extended and many times it was, culminating in the perpetual dictatorship of Julius Caesar.During the Roman republic, a dictator was an appointed office for usually a six month period. In that time, the dictator was supposed to take charge of the government and solve whatever problem that caused him to be appointed in the first place. The time of the office could be extended and many times it was, culminating in the perpetual dictatorship of Julius Caesar.During the Roman republic, a dictator was an appointed office for usually a six month period. In that time, the dictator was supposed to take charge of the government and solve whatever problem that caused him to be appointed in the first place. The time of the office could be extended and many times it was, culminating in the perpetual dictatorship of Julius Caesar.
In early Rome what is the role that lasted only until a crisis had passed?
A Dictator and a deputy Master of Horse was appointed for six months to deal with a crisis.
What is Brazil citizen role?
they elect presidents
What was the role in the consuls in Rome's republic?
the senate i think
What is a dictator's role in the economy?
to stand for leadership
What is status and role?
Adolf Hitler was a fascist dictator.
Could common citizens play the role of a one of the consuls in the roman republic?
In the Early Republic, apart from a short period when 30% of the consuls were plebeians, all the consuls were patricians (aristocrats). In 367 BC, the Lex (law) Licinia Sextia provided that at least one consul each year should be a plebeian. The plebeians were the commoners, all non-patricians. The term covered both the rich and the poor. Only rich plebeians became consuls.
What role did consuls play in Rome's government?
The Roman consuls served in the highest elected political office in the Roman Republic. Hope that helps! :) ;D
What role did the consul senate and dictator of the early roman empire play in the government?
they ruled the government for 6 months and were soposed to handel emergencys.They wre elected by the people.(aka roman men citizens) and could be dictator for six months. They handeld emergencys . Having them went realy well until ceasure became dictator.
What was the role of the citizens when Hitler was dictator?
There were no "citizens"; there were "subjects". Subjects obey, or die.
What best explains the role of a dictator during the Roman Republic?
The dictator ruled with almost absolute power for six months during times of war.
