Strong; powerful; efficient., Having sufficient strength or force; founded in truth; capable of being justified, defended, or supported; not weak or defective; sound; good; efficacious; as, a valid argument; a valid objection., Having legal strength or force; executed with the proper formalities; incapable of being rightfully overthrown or set aside; as, a valid deed; a valid covenant; a valid instrument of any kind; a valid claim or title; a valid marriage.
In scientific contexts, "valid" refers to the soundness and accuracy of a method, argument, or conclusion based on empirical evidence and logical reasoning. A valid experiment or study is one that effectively tests its hypothesis, ensuring that the results genuinely reflect the phenomenon being investigated. Validity also encompasses the degree to which a measurement accurately represents what it intends to measure. Thus, a valid scientific claim is supported by reliable data and appropriate methodologies.
To be considered valid, the results of a scientific experiment must be reliable and reproducible, meaning that they can be consistently obtained under the same conditions. Additionally, the experiment should be designed to control for variables that could influence the outcome, ensuring that any observed effects can be attributed to the factors being tested. Clear documentation of the methodology and data is also essential for peer review and verification by other researchers.
MEEP
I can not think of any special scientific word for "correct". Perhaps. "verified" or "verifiable" or "valid" or "validated" or "true" or "affirmed" or "proven".
To be aligned with some boundary. The best example of this is in word processing where the text is aligned with either the right margin, the left margin or both at the same time. In a more scientific application you can say that the face of a crystal is justified with with the molecular lattice, or the solution.
No, the scientific method can be uncontrolled to for it to be valid.
A valid scientific argument is one that is based on empirical evidence, logical reasoning, and adheres to the principles of the scientific method. It typically involves formulating a hypothesis, conducting experiments or observations to gather data, and drawing conclusions that are supported by the evidence. Additionally, a valid scientific argument should be reproducible and open to peer review, allowing others in the scientific community to evaluate and verify the findings. Importantly, it must also be falsifiable, meaning that it can be tested and potentially disproven.
To be considered valid, the results of a scientific experiment must be reproducible, meaning that other researchers should be able to replicate the experiment and obtain similar results. Additionally, the experiment must be based on a well-defined hypothesis and use appropriate methodologies to minimize bias and errors. Valid results should also be analyzed statistically to determine their significance and reliability.
when it is consistent with observation
this is the final or proven hypothesis
For a scientific theory to be considered valid, it must be testable and falsifiable, meaning that it can be subjected to experiments or observations that could potentially disprove it. Additionally, the theory should be consistent with existing evidence and capable of making accurate predictions about future observations. Peer review and reproducibility of results by independent researchers further enhance its credibility within the scientific community.
No; it is not testable.
Tom hale is the meaning of valid information, for instance you can say if he wasnt valid he couldn't have a british passport, to be valid is to be accepted.
The base word in "invalid" is "valid," which means something that is acceptable or true. When you add the prefix "in-" to "valid," it changes the meaning to "not valid" or "not acceptable."
its to old
It is to old
to make sure its valid