Foot men.
he was a awsome man he was kind and never hurt a sole.
footmen calvery and archers were used in the battle of Hastings for William to win it
he was kind
William was focused on the battle of Hastings and nothing else, he was prepared and if he hadn't won England wouldn't be the way it is neither the language of English........William was a very kind ruler and unlike Harold encouraged his soldiers to fight not force.
No he didn't because he had no choice he had to fight wiliam and try to surprise him Also he didn't rush into battle with harald because otherwse if he had waited any longer harald would have anded in England andd gain more troops along the way.
he was a awsome man he was kind and never hurt a sole.
footmen calvery and archers were used in the battle of Hastings for William to win it
he was kind
William was focused on the battle of Hastings and nothing else, he was prepared and if he hadn't won England wouldn't be the way it is neither the language of English........William was a very kind ruler and unlike Harold encouraged his soldiers to fight not force.
No he didn't because he had no choice he had to fight wiliam and try to surprise him Also he didn't rush into battle with harald because otherwse if he had waited any longer harald would have anded in England andd gain more troops along the way.
Yes, Harold Godwinson did not try to kill King Edward. In fact, Harold was a prominent English nobleman who served as an advisor to King Edward before becoming King of England himself.
The crisis happened because King Edward the Confessor appeared to have promised the Kingdom separately to two people. Some years earlier, he had been well-received and entertained in France, and had given some kind of assurance to William of Normandy, although William was illegitimate. In his last illness, however, he declared that his heir was Harold Godwinson. Harold duly became king, but William sailed to England to challenge this, and killed Harold at Hastngs.
The clique and harold
yes the Vikings were involved in the battle of 1066It was Harold hardrada claiming that he was the rightful king due to an agreement between his father hardicanute and the Danish ruler of EnglandThe agreementHardicanute had promised the throne to Kind Magnus of Norway and as magnus was too old to battle edward the confessor magnus's son Harold Hardrada was his heir and therefore said he was the next in line for the throne.
I think that william was a good but bad king because he gave everyone some land but he was a bad king because Peasants had little freedom.They had to carry out lots of duties for the knights and to be loyal to William in return for pretection.
the bayeux tapestry is a giant picture of 1066 pictures of 1000-1090 primary source it is
It was a series of air battles.