0
What kind of reasoning results in a conclusion that is not logically connected to its premise?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Faulty Apex :P
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What does negate the premise mean?
A premise is the fact or supposition upon which a chain of logic is based. If it is true, and logic (reasoning) is correctly applied, then the conclusion reached by the chain of logic is also true. When you negate the premise, you show that the premise is not true and that, therefore, the conclusion is not true, or at the least, has not been demonstrate to be true.
What is propositional thought?
Propositional thought is when you use abstract logic when you do not have concrete examples. For example it allows you to understand that if a premise is true, then a conclusion will be true. Like all men are are mortal. Premise Socrates is a man. Premise Therefore, Socrates is mortal. Conclusion Taken from Human Development, by Robert S. Feldman
What does non sequitur mean?
Non sequitur is Latin for "it does not follow". A statement is said to be a non sequitur if the conclusion does not follow from the premise.
A syllogism includes two premises and what else?
A syllogism includes two premises and a conclusion. The premises take the form of statement about classes of things and the conclusion is a similar statement which is necessarily implied by the premises.
Why is a premise called premise?
It is a word that means a proposition helping to support a conclusion. Adopted into English from Old French as 'premisse' who in turn has adopted the Latin word 'premisa', meaning to send or put before
Reasoning results in a conclusion that is not logically connected to the premise?
Faulty
Do conclusions that are not logically supported invalidate the entire study?
Conclusions that are not logically supported do not necessarily invalidate the entire study, but they do call into question the credibility and reliability of the findings. Researchers should ensure that their conclusions are based on sound logical reasoning and evidence to maintain the validity of their study.
What are the two parts of an argument?
The two parts of a logical argument are the premise (or premises) and the conclusion. The premise is the part of an argument that visibly have evidence or logical steps to reach a conclusion. A conclusion is the result of the reasoning in the premise.
What is minor premise?
A premise has one term in common with a conclusion. A minor premise contains the minor term in the conclusion, which is the subject. It can be described as a subtle or deceptive argument or deductive reasoning.
In reasoning the conclusion derived from the premise is likely to be valid but is not necessarily so?
Inductive
Four steps of deductive reasoning?
Start with a premise or general statement. Apply a specific case or situation to the premise. Draw a conclusion based on the relationship between the premise and the specific case. Validate the conclusion by ensuring it logically follows from the premise and specific case.
What does negate the premise mean?
A premise is the fact or supposition upon which a chain of logic is based. If it is true, and logic (reasoning) is correctly applied, then the conclusion reached by the chain of logic is also true. When you negate the premise, you show that the premise is not true and that, therefore, the conclusion is not true, or at the least, has not been demonstrate to be true.
What type of reasoning is used when a scientist tests a hypothesis?
That would be deductive reasoning, as this type of reasoning moves from a general premise (an hypothesis) to a more specific conclusion (theory).
Premise 1 If being humble is thinking of others then does it logicly follow that if p 2 one were to buy an item for ones personal entertainment conclusion 2 one would be selfish and therefore greedy?
Premise 1 is false. Even if it were correct, conclusion 2 doesn't logically follow.
The argument that states People who major in engineering are good in math you are good in math so you should major in engineering is?
It is invalid because the conclusion does not follow logically from the premise.
What type of argument starts from a more general idea to reach a more specific conclusion?
A deductive argument starts from a more general idea to reach a more specific conclusion. It involves moving from a premise that is universally accepted to a specific conclusion that logically follows from that premise.
This argument can move from a specific premise to a specific conclusion or from a general premise to a general conclusion?
An argument can move from a specific premise to a specific conclusion by providing detailed evidence or examples to support the specific claim. On the other hand, an argument can move from a general premise to a general conclusion by making a broad assertion based on the general principle presented. Both forms of arguments can be effective depending on the context and the strength of the premises.
