Logically, it was a very deadly snake because the islanders recognized it as such and expected Paul to die very quickly. Non-believers claim it was a non-venomous snake, but I believe the natives would have known the difference. Some claim that Malta has no deadly snakes; perhaps it did 2000 years ago. However, the purpose was clearly to show those people that God was indeed with Paul and that they should hear his message.
Kind of depends on the kind of snake.
From the Bible: Paul gathered a pile of brushwood and, as he put it on the fire, a viper, driven out by the heat, fastened itself on his hand. But Paul shook the snake off into the fire and suffered no ill effects.? Paul did not seek out to handle a snake. The snake bit Paul, but God protected Paul from the effects of the snake bite.
She was supposedly bitten on the breast by an asp
He was bitten by a snake is grammatically correct.
yes, the king cobra is very strong and can kill a lot of animals
It is and isn't rare.
It bit her in the heel.
snake
A snake didn't bite Uncle Monty. Count Olaf killed him and said that The Incredibly Deadly Viper bit him.
If it is a non-venomous snake, probably nothing would happen. If it was a venomous snake and it bit itself, it could quite possible die. There are documented cases of venomous snakes accidentally 'committing suicide' when they bit themselves.
There is no record of Cleopatra ever getting bitten by a snake.
i would say it has to do with the snake and how long it bit you for but if it was a very dangerous snake then perhaps about 4 seconds the less hazzardous snakes it will be longer but you will be begging for it to end so it really depends on the snake and remember some snake bites are uncureable