There used to be four different status in Chinese feudal society, which are classified by occupations. From the highest to the lowest, the 1st rank are soldiers and intellectuals, the 2nd are farmers, the 3rd are craftsmen and general laborers, the last are merchants and peddlers.Merchants are believed without moral restraint and regarded as inferior jobs by the mainstream ideology. Hence, they are certainly not allowed to work for the government. In addition, only people of the 1st social status have direct access to government jobs at that time.In feudal China,land was the most valuable thing to a regime.All the power came from land. China emperor was the final power owner,he owned all the land of his empire.and what he needed ,was to rule all the people including farmers,merchants,feudal landlords in an arbitrary way ,governors were the good enough tools to meet this aim.If merchants have government jobs,that was no better use to help the emperor to keep his land.in a word,merchants mean nothing to the emperor,their social status were too low to have the gov jobs.
If you are talking about the Roman Empire, it was Romulus Augustus
2013
it supported Shi Huangdi's goverment by creating a strong empire that could last for a long time.
When the government no longer serves the needs of the people, but Jefferson also adds that "the people" have to first try to reason with the government and to change it peacefully. Only as a last resort must they move against the government.
China
PuYi was the last emperor in China
It had a communist government and still does. In 1939 the people's revolution took place overthrowing the Emperor. A good movie on this is THE LAST EMPEROR. It is a beautiful movie and cinematography is fantastic.
The last ruler to work on the great wall of China was the emperor of the Han dynasty, otherwise known as Liu Bang.
Henry P'u Yi
The Ming Dynasty is the last Chinese dynasty of record. Zhū Yóuláng or rather Emperor Yǒnglì is China's last Han-Chinese emperor of record. The last date of his rule was 1646-1662 in mainland China. Also, factor into this that the main Ming Dynasty Imperial lineage ended with Emperor Chóngzhēn in 1644. Manchurians, who are not Chinese, conquered China in 1644. If Japanese had conquered China, would the Chinese people, today, acknowledge Emperor Akihito as their emperor, with Crown Prince Naruhito, as their monarch today? Why then should the Chinese accept Manchurian rule and forgo their own blood?
shane sutton
The last emperor of China, emperor of record, being Han-Chinese, would be the Zhū Yóujiǎn or Emperor Chóngzhēn, who ruled China from 1627-1644. Manchurians (people from MANCHURIA) then conquered China and China's imperial court then went into hiding and continued their lineage and succession in view of foreign rule over the Han-Chinese people.
No. China does not have emperors anymore. But there is a president and it's just like the other countries. It is the most populated country also. I want to add an answer to this. They are not just like other countries. They are a communist country and the last emperor was arrested by the communist revolution that happened in the 1930's. He ended up working in a labor camp. If you want to see his story check out the movie "The Last Emperor."
The Emperor. The last emperor of China was Pu Yi, also known as Henry Pu Yi and his Manchu name was Aisin Gioro
China
Henry Pu Yi was the last emperor of China