Want this question answered?
It changed the balance of power which had previously existed by allowing those territories popular sovereignty to decide whether to allow slavery or not for themselves.
Stephen Douglas supported the Kansas-Nebraska Act because he believed in popular sovereignty, allowing new territories to decide on the issue of slavery for themselves. This was problematic for anti-slavery advocates because it repealed the Missouri Compromise of 1820, which had prohibited slavery in territories north of a certain latitude. This effectively opened up the possibility for slavery to expand into territories where it had previously been prohibited.
Northern abolitionists and free soilers would have been concerned about the potential spread of slavery into new territories with the passage of the Kansas-Nebraska Act in 1854. This act allowed for popular sovereignty in these territories, which could have led to the expansion of slavery into areas where it had previously been prohibited.
Japan
To minimise the possibility of previously unforeseen hazards and accidents
japan
The Missouri Compromise dealt with the expansion of slavery into the western territory (previously known as the Louisiana Territory).
It pushed the Indians into even smaller reservations and pushed white people and culture into previously Indian territories.
They were all sent to Africa where they worked picking up elephant poo and cleaning sheds.
Saskatchewan and Alberta became provinces on September 1, 1905. They were previously part of the Northwest Territories.
Because, previously they were autonomous territories ruled by Emirs, after union in 1971, they became united and are now ruled by a federal government
No, there are several versions of the written test so that you don't have the possibility of getting the same test that you may have already previously failed.