Well for both, technological inferiority and smallpox (more on the smallpox part). And also for the Aztecs, the participation of thousands of people whom they oppressed on the spanish side of the siege of tenochtitlan. For the Incas, the striking similarity of Pizarro looking like Quetzcoatl, thus explaining an initial hesitancy to fight, allowing the Spanish a surprise attack that captured their King.
They are both people and in the Americas
Both the Aztec and the Inca were defeated by Spanish conquistadors. Both the Aztec and the Inca were New World empires. Both the Aztec and Inca had calendars of their own. Both had gold artifacts that the Spanish wanted.
Both empires were relatively the same size. They were, however, marginalized in Peru with the arrival of the colonial Spaniards. Some say for every 1 Inca, there were 2-3 Aztecs.
Both the Inca and the Aztecs were defeated by the Spanish. Horses and guns were able to defeat spears and arrows. The Spanish took the gold, silver, and jewels back to Spain and then forced the natives to farm for them. The Spanish also converted the natives to Christianity.
Loss of their respective water supplies
i would not know the answer
They are both people and in the Americas
Both the Aztec and the Inca were defeated by Spanish conquistadors. Both the Aztec and the Inca were New World empires. Both the Aztec and Inca had calendars of their own. Both had gold artifacts that the Spanish wanted.
Both the Aztec and the Inca were defeated by Spanish conquistadors. Both the Aztec and the Inca were New World empires. Both the Aztec and Inca had calendars of their own. Both had gold artifacts that the Spanish wanted.
because the they all had the calender based on the month or the day and they all sacrificed human hearts
Both Francisco Pizarro and Hernando Cortes were Spanish conquistadors who played key roles in the Spanish conquest of the Americas. Cortes is best known for his conquest of the Aztec Empire in present-day Mexico, while Pizarro is known for the conquest of the Inca Empire in present-day Peru. While both expeditions were marked by brutal tactics and the ultimate subjugation of indigenous peoples, Cortes had a more significant impact on Aztec society due to the downfall of their powerful empire, whereas Pizarro's conquest dismantled the Inca Empire's political structure without completely eradicating their culture.
Hern‡n CortŽs conquered the Aztec empire in Mexico, and Francisco Pizarro conquered the Inca empire in Perœ. Both completed their conquests in the sixteenth century.
Both the Aztecs and Inca were defeated by the Spanish. Both were forced to give the Spanish gold.
Both Pizarro and Cortes were Spanish conquistadors who led successful expeditions in the Americas. They conquered the Aztec Empire under Cortes and the Inca Empire under Pizarro, bringing vast territories under Spanish control. Their conquests resulted in the downfall of powerful indigenous empires and the establishment of Spanish colonial rule in the Americas.
Hernan Cortes and Francisco Pizarro were both Spanish conquistadors who played crucial roles in the Spanish conquest of the Americas. They led expeditions that resulted in the downfall of powerful indigenous empires—Cortes conquered the Aztec Empire in present-day Mexico, while Pizarro conquered the Inca Empire in present-day Peru.
Both empires were relatively the same size. They were, however, marginalized in Peru with the arrival of the colonial Spaniards. Some say for every 1 Inca, there were 2-3 Aztecs.
The Inca and Aztec civilizations were impacted by European explorations and colonizations through violence, disease, and forced labor, leading to the decline and eventual downfall of their empires. Their populations were decimated by diseases such as smallpox brought by the Europeans, and their societies were disrupted by ongoing conflicts and the imposition of European cultural norms and beliefs. European colonization also led to the exploitation of their resources and the destruction of their traditional ways of life.