0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Does a scientist consider a hypothesis to be a fact?
Scientist consider hypothesis to be an educated guess on what they are studying. If that scientist researches and experiments more, he will see if his hypothesis is true or false.
What does a scientist do if hypothsis is not supported?
make a new hypothesis. if not the scientist continues believing in their hypothesis without any proof and becomes a mad scientist
What should a scientist do if a hypothesis is not supported?
If I was the scientist you would test is as soon as possible then just skip the hypothesis step
After the scientist makes a hypothesis they perform a to collect data?
the answer is the scientist designs a scientific inquiry
What do scientist perform after a hypothesis?
face
A scientist makes an educated guess that diabetes is caused by genetic factors His guess is an example of a n?
A scientist making an educated guess that diabetes is caused by genetic factors is stating a hypothesis. The scientist may then design an experiment to test this hypothesis.
Does a scientist consider a hypothesis to be a fact?
Scientist consider hypothesis to be an educated guess on what they are studying. If that scientist researches and experiments more, he will see if his hypothesis is true or false.
How can a rejected hypothesis be of value to a scientist?
the reason why a rejected hypothesis can still be of value to a scientist is because that secific hyothesis may not work for your experiment but it could work for a different experiment/theory
What options does a scientist have if experiment does not support hypothesis?
a scientist can do another experiment or change their hypothesis.
After a hypothesis what do scienrist do?
the scientist proposed a theory after hypothesis.
What does a scientist do if hypothsis is not supported?
make a new hypothesis. if not the scientist continues believing in their hypothesis without any proof and becomes a mad scientist
Scientist encourage other scientist to review and repeat their experiments so that their hypothesis may become?
supported by enough data to become a theory.
What do scientist do when their data does not support their hypothesis?
Discard or change the hypothesis.
What should a scientist do if a hypothesis is supported?
If I was the scientist you would test is as soon as possible then just skip the hypothesis step
What should a scientist do if a hypothesis is not supported?
If I was the scientist you would test is as soon as possible then just skip the hypothesis step
Why is careful obersavation important to being a scientist?
A scientist may create an hypothesis on the basis of their observations. If their observations are carelessly made or recorded then any hypotheses they offer will be inaccurate reflections of nature. A scientist may alternatively collect observations to test an hypothesis. If these observations are carelessly made or recorded then the conclusions that the scientist makes about the hypothesis could very well be incorrect. At the very least the conclusions they draw would not be based on sound evidence (because the observations are unsound).
What are the three steps scientist take to evaluate a scientist explanations?
1. Experiment 2.hypothesis 3. Checking hypothesis
