In the Middle Ages, the Crusaders used three principal methods of fighting. The first and most prominent was the charge by horse-borne knights, whether individually or in formation. As common was the direct advance by foot-soldiers bearing bladed weapons or blunt weapons (such as clubs). Increasingly common as years passed was the use of bowed weapons, with the European crossbow coming to be especially feared by their Arabic opponents in the Middle East.
Anna Comnena thought highly of the civilized crusaders fighting for God, but greatly disliked the dirty and wreck-less crusaders. She speaks about their imposing on her empire and being so brutal for no reason. Pretty much she respected the true crusaders, but didn't like the brutal ones going on crusades for money and power.
one third
He wanted to experience the singing of the sirens.
This is because they didn't have enough crusaders.
Cause hes stupid
The crusaders were Catholic, mainly fighting Muslims.
They were fighting over the holy land of Jerusalem
the crusaders were fighting muslims to capture the holy land of Jerusalem.
The armies that the Crusaders were fighting were mostly compromised of either Muslims or Christians. They were claiming to be fighting for religion.
Jordan how r u
muslims
12,000
Blitz Krieg
12,000
The armies that the Crusaders were fighting were mostly compromised of either Muslims or Christians. They were claiming to be fighting for religion.
The Crusades were the battle and a battle does not fight, soldiers in the battle fight. If your question was asking what the Crusaders were fighting for and who they were fighting against see the below link.
Salah al-Din had highest regards for crusaders,since they were fighting to protect their religion in true sense. He thought crusaders did not know that their religion was denigrating in the hands of their leaders..............