he used speeches and said them to black people. He bacially told black people not to like white. He believed in violence.
Malcom X used brutal violent tactics
Answer: He felt that the movement was not progressing quickly enough and had relied too much on white 'permission'. He felt that African Americans should change their strategy to achieve their goals.
MLK chose to use nonviolent protesting which ended up working more. X used violence and made the owners hate them more and use force back.
You can use it to illustrate alot of things.
No, certainly not. The consequences' of the Civil Rights Movement would have been different if they had been lead by King instead of Malcolm. The reason behind this is that both of them belonged to different cultures and religion. They both opened their eyes in two different environments that had a huge impact upon the establishment of their personalities. King was raised in an environment which was well-organized and cared for education whereas Malcolm was provided with a family that was unprivileged and went through several hardships. Malcolm believed that there was no equality and that blacks had to retaliate against the white's in order to gain rights. Whereas, King believed that all races are equal and that love was the only cure. The Civil Rights Movement would have been far more peaceful if it had been lead by King. Malcolm was a man who had deadly plans and was sure to use force against whites in any case. The difference would certainly have brought about a change in the American History as well as a huge impact upon the Civil Rights Movement. -Regards, Hope it helps.
Yes. That was one of several methods used by protestors for improved Civil Rights. Also, black Americans were not the only ones to participate in these protests.
Malcolm X protested for the civil rights of African-Americans in the United States in the 1960s. He is often accused of advocating violence because of his use of radical language. But Malcolm only advocated the use of violence as a form of self defense. He threatened the use of violence by his people as a deterrant to those who would use it on them.
Malcolm X use NON - Violent! But some of his supporters did get violent.
Civil rights are the rights of individuals to receive equal treatment and protection under the law. For example, "The civil rights movement in the United States fought to secure equal rights and opportunities for all individuals regardless of their race."
the two methods used were the constitution and the bill of rights
Answer: He felt that the movement was not progressing quickly enough and had relied too much on white 'permission'. He felt that African Americans should change their strategy to achieve their goals.
Malcolm X insisted that Americans should fight for their rights and that violence was acceptable to that end. He refused to see the black communities culpability. Malcolm X called on people to use violence to demand more rights. His beliefs were really strong that blacks and whites should be equal. His method was tactical, very similar to Martin Luther Kings. Malcolm x started several Muslim groups around the country and preached his revolutionary attitudes towards white. -Dandy#porn
MLK chose to use nonviolent protesting which ended up working more. X used violence and made the owners hate them more and use force back.
You can use it to illustrate alot of things.
The plebeians needed their own assembly and elected officials in order to use their civil rights and to have an input into the government.The plebeians needed their own assembly and elected officials in order to use their civil rights and to have an input into the government.The plebeians needed their own assembly and elected officials in order to use their civil rights and to have an input into the government.The plebeians needed their own assembly and elected officials in order to use their civil rights and to have an input into the government.The plebeians needed their own assembly and elected officials in order to use their civil rights and to have an input into the government.The plebeians needed their own assembly and elected officials in order to use their civil rights and to have an input into the government.The plebeians needed their own assembly and elected officials in order to use their civil rights and to have an input into the government.The plebeians needed their own assembly and elected officials in order to use their civil rights and to have an input into the government.The plebeians needed their own assembly and elected officials in order to use their civil rights and to have an input into the government.
Use the total station.
No, certainly not. The consequences' of the Civil Rights Movement would have been different if they had been lead by King instead of Malcolm. The reason behind this is that both of them belonged to different cultures and religion. They both opened their eyes in two different environments that had a huge impact upon the establishment of their personalities. King was raised in an environment which was well-organized and cared for education whereas Malcolm was provided with a family that was unprivileged and went through several hardships. Malcolm believed that there was no equality and that blacks had to retaliate against the white's in order to gain rights. Whereas, King believed that all races are equal and that love was the only cure. The Civil Rights Movement would have been far more peaceful if it had been lead by King. Malcolm was a man who had deadly plans and was sure to use force against whites in any case. The difference would certainly have brought about a change in the American History as well as a huge impact upon the Civil Rights Movement. -Regards, Hope it helps.
These song does not really go with civil rights but you can use its SHOW ME WHAT Ïm LOOKING FOR.I hope that helps you