Without the right to a trial by jury, criminal or civil disputes could be decided arbitrarily by a judge as opposed to based on a more balanced review from fellow citizens.
Without the Sixth Amendment, the majority of trials would be unfair. Many people might be sent to jail because of the trial would most likely have a biased jury.
People would be persecuted and sent to jail without a fair trial.
The Second Amendment is there to protect our right listed in the first Amendment.
The Magna Carta is an agreement limiting the kings power; King George gave up being the right to tax the people so much.
Gadget Trial happened in 2006.
Without the Sixth Amendment, the majority of trials would be unfair. Many people might be sent to jail because of the trial would most likely have a biased jury.
People would be persecuted and sent to jail without a fair trial.
Hi I think that the right to a fair trail for a suspect is more important than the right to report that trial. A suspect is not a proven criminal. It would be prudent to give him/her a chance to prove his/her innocence. If the right of reporting that trial is extended to the press, there are chances that the information might get colored as different press bodies might have different things to say about the trail.
freedom of speech
Question is unclear . . . If the defendant/plaintiff is guranteed the "right to a fair trial," then the defendant/plaintiff's corresponding responsibility would seem to be, to tell the truth in all matters pertaining to the trial. We all know how likely THAT is to happen.
The right to trial by jury is guaranteed in all criminal cases and civil cases over a certain dollar amount.
The Second Amendment is there to protect our right listed in the first Amendment.
The Magna Carta is an agreement limiting the kings power; King George gave up being the right to tax the people so much.
Trial of the Detectives happened in 1877.
Gadget Trial happened in 2006.
Outreau trial happened in 2004.
JBTZ trial happened in 1988.