The strong nuclear force must balance electrostatic forces in the nucleus
Its outermost energy shell must be filled with electrons.
a nucleus is stable when it undergoes radioactive decay, that is the easy way to say it
Increasing the temperature or pressure.
No. If a cell contains a nucleus, it must be a eukaryote.
the process mitosis must happen. the most crucial part of this process for this question is when the nucleus copies its data for the two new cells
The cell would not reproduce if the nucleus is not present
In the Nucleus
there is no such thing. a cell must have a nucleus to be considered a cell. 8) The answer above is wrong. Most bacteria have no nucleus. It is called prokaryotic when there is a missing nucleus.
It would not be stable and fall apart.
sodium must lose one electron
Lose one electron
A nucleus is stable if the electrostatic and strong nuclear forces balance out.
The strong nuclear force must balance electrostatic forces in the nucleus
there wont be any negative charges to balance the positive nucleus, hence atoms wont be stable
It becomes most stable when its nucleus is filled, not when it is filling it.
Nothing. Krypton is already just about as stable as it's possible for an element to get.
You can not predict whether an isotope nucleus is likely to be stable. There is a lack of electrons in the nucleus creating a chemical change in the atom becoming stable.
A stable nucleus is one which will not decay, whereas an unstable nucleus will decay at some point, which cannot be predicted as decay is a random process, by alpha or beta decay.
The atoms having 2 protons only in nucleus is not stable but 2 protons with 2 neutron in Helium nucleus are very stable.
flourine must gain one electron