The strong nuclear force must balance electrostatic forces in the nucleus
This statement is incorrect. Prokaryotic cells do not contain a nucleus. They have their genetic material located in the cytoplasm in a region called the nucleoid. Cells with a nucleus are eukaryotic.
Before transcription can take place, the DNA in the cell nucleus must be unwound and separated into two strands by enzymes. This process exposes the genetic information that will be transcribed into mRNA.
A characteristic of a radioactive nucleus is that it undergoes spontaneous decay, emitting radiation in the form of alpha particles, beta particles, or gamma rays in order to achieve a more stable configuration.
The information that controls the production of proteins must pass from the nucleus into the cytoplasm in the form of mRNA. mRNA is a template copy of the DNA inside the nucleus and is read by ribosomes in the cytoplasm to produce proteins.
Well obviously in any one atom or cell there can only be ONE nucleus. However, the plural of "nucleus" is "nuclei", as in "the nuclei of the cells visible under the microscope were all stained blue and the nucleus of one cell stood out from the rest".
A nucleus is stable if the electrostatic and strong nuclear forces balance out.
Nothing. Krypton is already just about as stable as it's possible for an element to get.
there wont be any negative charges to balance the positive nucleus, hence atoms wont be stable
It becomes most stable when its nucleus is filled, not when it is filling it.
The process of removing an electron from a stable nucleus is called electron capture. In this process, an electron is absorbed by a proton in the nucleus, converting the proton into a neutron and releasing a neutrino. This results in a more stable arrangement of particles in the nucleus.
If the binding energy of a nucleus was zero, the nucleus would not be stable and would disintegrate. The nucleus relies on the binding energy to hold its protons and neutrons together. Without this binding energy, the nucleus would break apart into individual protons and neutrons.
A stable nucleus is one which will not decay, whereas an unstable nucleus will decay at some point, which cannot be predicted as decay is a random process, by alpha or beta decay.
You can predict whether an isotope nucleus is likely to be stable by considering the ratio of protons to neutrons in the nucleus. Nuclei with a more balanced ratio of protons to neutrons tend to be more stable. Additionally, nuclei with magic numbers of protons or neutrons are also more likely to be stable.
The atoms having 2 protons only in nucleus is not stable but 2 protons with 2 neutron in Helium nucleus are very stable.
Without neutrons, the nucleus would lack stability as neutrons help bind protons together through the strong nuclear force. As a result, the nucleus would likely be unstable and prone to decay, potentially leading to the emission of particles or radiation in order to achieve a more stable configuration.
By definition. If it were stable, then it would not be radioactive.
Being radioactive, uranium is not a stable element.