I don't completely understand the question. If you are referring to an individuals case of obesity then you would word the sentence "Case of Obesity." like "John has a severe case of obesity."
If you are referring to one or more people that are obese you would phrase it. "There are many cases of obesity in Texas."
The correct phrase is "arrived for her." In this case, "her" is the objective pronoun that should be used after the preposition "for."
No, the correct phrase is "You are a quick learner." "You are" is the correct way to start a sentence in this case since it is referring to the listener.
No, the correct phrase would be "In compliance with all points above."
The phrase 'rex regorum' is incorrect. The phrase is from the ancient, classical Latin, which is a language that uses case endings. In this specific example, the word 'rex', which means 'king', is expessed correctly in the nominative, or subject, case. But the word 'regorum' doesn't exist. Instead, the correct word is 'regum', which is the plural form of the genitive, or possessive, case. Therefore, the correct phrase is 'rex regum', and the correct meaning king of kings.
The correct phrase is "bears repeating", bear, in this case, meaning warrant.
The possessive form of the plural noun phrase is the lawyers' cases (the cases of the lawyers).The possessive for plural nouns that end with an -s is formed by adding an apostrophe (') after the ending -s.Example: All of our lawyers' cases are compiled in an archive for quick reference.
In rare cases obesity can be caused by genetic disorders and other medical problems. By far, the greatest cause of obesity is life style choices. Lack of proper exercise and over eating. For such cases there are 'simple' cures for this. A balanced diet and regular exercise will, in most cases, 'cure' obesity. It is advisable to consult a medical professional if the case is extreme.
The correct phrase is "On the same plane". A plane in this case being a level of development, existence, or achievement.
Yes, but the phrase is "on the same plane". In this case, "plane" does not mean aircraft, but flat level or surface, and the phrase means "on the same level of existance, consciousness or development".
Correct. The appellate court will only consider whether the law was correctly applied in the case.
The phrase "is all" can be correct grammar in certain contexts, such as when emphasizing that something is entirely or completely the case. For example, "The cake is all gone" or "Her argument is all wrong."
No, the correct phrase is "should have worn." "Wore" is the past tense of "wear," but in this case "have worn" is the correct past perfect form.