Want this question answered?
You would use a hypothesis during an experiment. The experiment does not necessarily have to be of science, though the term hypothesis is primarily used for such category.wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn defines hypothesisas# a proposal intended to explain certain facts or observations # guess: a message expressing an opinion based on incomplete evidence A hypothesis is seen in the beginning of an experiment, stating a prediction by the one(s) conducting and carrying out the experiment. The rest of the experiment, or procedure with data, then serves to prove the hypothesis a true and possible prediction, or to be incorrect. The outcome of the experiment is what determines if the stated hypothesis is a successful and true proposal.The hypothesis's success or failure is recorded in the conclusion section of the experiment, located reasonably at the end.-youFITCH.
Yes, as long as the explanation is modified by new evidence.
Evidence supports a model in which periods of relative stability are punctuated by short periods of rapid (relatively speaking) change. It could, theoretically, be possible for evolution to proceed in a gradual manner. However, mathematical modelling and fossil evidence show that punctuated equilibrium is the norm.
To begin forming a hypothesis, you must observe your problem and try to imagine possible solutions. In other words, you must determine the cause and effect of possible explanations, so you can then determine if they can be proven wrong It relates because "cause and effect" is often used to find out the outcome of something. A hypothesis is a prediction on what you are about to find out By Linda
In the scientific world that could be a theory, hypothesis, qualitative observation, prediction, or an inference. You can choose one.
Yes, it is. You can make a prediction about the gender of an unborn child and the gender is not even a number!
Prediction is not possible.
Hypothesis
Yes
You gather information relevant to the situation (facts, background, statistics, history), and you play out all possible outcomes in your head. The one that seems most likely is your good prediction.
You think of the most possible outcome. But even THAT you can never be sure of. I think it's best to think of EVERY possible out come instead.
A. Excuses B. Your investigation plan C. Your prediction D. Possible errors
Because its always changing and there are too many possible factors to make an accurate prediction.
Scientists decide whether their data supports or refutes their hypothesis or prediction; they look for possible errors...
Arthur Gouge has written: 'Flying boats and their possible developments' -- subject(s): Seaplanes
Maya Murbada is not a reliable tarot card user, her predictions are not to be taken as possible, even to Americans.
It refers to using the evidence available to 'reconstruct,' insofar as possible, what happened during the offense.