0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What did The Kalamazoo Case 1874 set a legal precedent for?
The Kalamazoo Case of 1874 set a precedent that taxing citizens for secondary education (post elementary school) was legal.
Which landmark case set a precedent or standard for identifying a class of fundamental personal rights?
The landmark case that set a precedent for identifying a class of fundamental personal rights is Griswold v. Connecticut (1965). This case established the right to privacy as a fundamental right, extending protections to activities such as marital privacy and contraception. The ruling in Griswold laid the foundation for future cases involving personal autonomy and privacy rights.
Which case set the precedent that verbal warnings must be given to a suspect during arrest?
Miranda v Arizona was the case that set the precedent that verbal warnings must be given to a suspect during arrest.
What is the role of judicial precedents?
A precedent is when the outcome of a case helps set the rules for future cases. A judge doesnâ??t have to use a precedent in the ruling, but precedents can be used to predict how a case will turn out.
What term describes a ruling in an earlier legal case that is similar to a current case?
Precedent
What precedent was set in the Supreme Court case Engel v. Vitale (1962)?
that all ballsacks are to be round
Should you say set a precedence or precedent?
precedent
What important precedent did John Marshall set in the case if Murbury V Madison?
John Marshall managed to set the principle of judicial review.
What is an example of a precedent in relation to interpreting law?
A precedent is a case that set the basis for any later case to be judged on, if it has the same principles. This is so cases of the same type may get the same outcome, depending on the circumstances.
Which Supreme Court case set the precedent for the supremacy of the national government during Reconstruction?
McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
What precedent was set in the US v Nixon case?
The precedent set in the US v Nixon case was that the president of the United States is not immune from being subpoenaed or compelled to produce evidence in a criminal investigation. The case established that executive privilege, while a legitimate and important concept, is not absolute and can be overridden by the need for justice and the rule of law.
What precedent was set with the fundamental Orders of connecticticut?
The precedent for voluntary union of the colonies was set with the fundamental orders of Connecticut.
