0
Miranda v. Arizona established that a suspect's waiver of rights must be informed and intentional. In order to ensure this, the Court established a precedent requiring police to inform people in police custody of their constitutional rights prior to questioning.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoMiranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)
It is mandatory to explain to an accused his or her relevant Fifth and Sixth Amendment constitutional rights against self-incrimination and to consult with an attorney prior to questioning.
Update
The Miranda ruling has been revised somewhat by subsequent Supreme Court decisions. On June 1, 2010, the Roberts' Court released the opinion for Berghuis v. Thompkins,08-1470 (2010), which held a defendant must invoke his right to remain silent (by stating he wants to remain silent), rather than waive it (by explicitly agreeing to answer questions before interrogation).
For more information, see Related Questions, below.
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoThe requirement that a suspect be informed of his rights prior to questioning.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Which case set the precedent that verbal warnings must be given to a suspect during arrest?
Miranda v Arizona was the case that set the precedent that verbal warnings must be given to a suspect during arrest.
Are the Miranda rights a state law?
The supreme court case Miranda v. Arizona set the precedent for Miranda rights. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miranda_v._Arizona The case of MIRANDA v. ARIZONA, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) was based on infringement of the 5th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America. The government (read police) were not reminding people that they had certain protections under the Constitution, including the right not to incriminate themselves in criminal activity. The Supreme Court found that information gathered from a suspect in a custodial environment without the reminder was a violation of Fifth Amendment rights.
The case that established rights that are read at the time of the arrest was vs Arizona?
Miranda v. Arizona
What are the results of Miranda v Arizona?
5-4 miranda wins
What Warren Court decision determined that people had to be informed of their rights before being questioned by police?
Miranda v. Arizona.
How do you cite US Supreme Court case in Blue Book Miranda v Arizona and in Westlaw?
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)
Did the Miranda v Arizona established the supremacy clause?
No.
What was the date of Miranda v. Arizona case?
1966
What is the name of the Supreme court case that changed law enforcement across the nation?
Miranda v. Arizona
Who were the parties in the US Supreme Court case Miranda v Arizona?
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)Ernesto Miranda was the plaintiff; the state of Arizona was the defendant. In a court case, the plaintiff/petitioner's name is always listed first, and the defendant/respondent's name is listed last.
Miranda v Arizona (1966)?
(1966) *Rights of the Accused
Which warren court decision determined that people hat to be informed of their rights before being questioned by the police?
Miranda v. Arizona
