The word for this is "innuendo" and it can be done by an association with an act or person, or allowing the audience to infer a meaning from the phrasing used.
For example, someone might say that an official has a better wardrobe, or home, than one might expect of someone earning a small official salary. The suggestion is that some other source of income exists, perhaps illegal or improper, especially if this income is not widely known to the public.
The rhetorical device you are referring to is called innuendo. It involves hinting at a negative or derogatory idea without explicitly stating it, allowing the speaker to suggest something without outright making an accusation.
An ellipsis. It is used to indicate that something has been omitted from a quotation or to create a pause in writing for dramatic or rhetorical effect.
The type of language that means the opposite of what is actually said is called irony. It is a rhetorical device characterized by incongruity between what is expected and what actually occurs. Irony can be used for humor, satire, or to convey a deeper meaning.
Yes, "actually" can be used as an adverb to emphasize the truth or reality of something rather than as a verb.
The word "accentuate" means to emphasize or highlight something, making it more noticeable or prominent.
What you're describing is sarcasm, where someone says the opposite of what they actually mean for humor or to convey irony. It's a form of verbal irony.
The answer is insinuation but I'm not sure that it's a rhetorical device.
Innuendo A slanting device which incorporates the manipulation of language by insulating something deprecatory about someone or something without actually saying it. (Points :1) Rhetorical definition Innuendo Fallacy Stereotype
innuendo
That would be 'to insinuate'
His rhetorical abilities meant that he was often sought as a featured speaker. An interrogative remark that does not actually seek an answer is called a rhetorical question.
An ellipsis. It is used to indicate that something has been omitted from a quotation or to create a pause in writing for dramatic or rhetorical effect.
The function of bombast is to inflate language to make something seem more important or impressive than it actually is. It is often used to create a sense of grandeur or importance in writing or speaking.
Verbal irony is a rhetorical device that highlights the contrast between what is said and what is actually meant or true, often leading to an unexpected outcome that defies reader expectations.
It is a RHETORICAL QUESTION. What makes a question rhetorical is that it is not asked as a question, but more as a fact, and does not require an answer. It is usually defined as any question asked for a purpose other than to obtain the information the question asks. * Example : "Why do you keep doing that?" It is commonly used as a persuasive element in a speech or text. * Example : "Does the government really care about the taxpayer?" Sometimes the question is open to an uninvited answer. * Example : "Do you take me for a fool?"
An expression used to suggest that there is evidence or authority for a claim without actually saying that there is.
They are asking you a question, if you actually said yes it is then a rhetorical question. Another answer: It also indicated disbelief on the part of the questioner that you said "yes".
Right! No. Right! No... ARGH! As this is a rhetorical question I believe it is not supposed to have an answer. I also believe people shouldn't use wikianswers for rhetorical questions. Wikianswers is supposed to be used for finding out things not for fun with rhetorical questions. Things like this shouldn't be put on. Remember the one you saw before? Saying you are actually left to die? I would be utterly offended if they were saying that to me. So in conclusion, I suggest you do not put rhetorical questions up unless there should be an answer. P.S. Neither. You are not am I right. YOU ARE RIGHT! But unfortunately, you did not say why you are right so you are right about nothing. :P