answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

often people would kill themselves to avoid roman slavery.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What rights did slaves have under the Roman Republic?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What rights did slaves have during roman republic?

Slavery was an important part of Roman society. There were two types of slaves. The educated slaves who were employed as teachers, Accountants and other skilled professionals and the uneducated slaves who worked in farms, mines and homes. Slaves were considered the property of their master and had no rights under the law. Their lives were hard and they were often exposed to corporal punishment and sexual exploitation.


What rights did the slaves have during the Roman Republic?

Slavery was an important part of Roman society. There were two types of slaves. The educated slaves who were employed as teachers, accountants and other skilled professionals and the uneducated slaves who worked in farms, mines and homes. Slaves were considered the property of their master and had no rights under the law. Their lives were hard and they were often exposed to corporal punishment and sexual exploitation.


How did the roman republic from government under the Etruscan?

because Romans have republic government.


How was the roman empires government?

The Roman Empire started during the Roman Republic, that is under a republican government. The Republic was then replaced by the absolute rule by emperors.


How did the roman republic differ government under the Etruscans?

because Romans have republic government.


What personal sacrifice did Brutus make for the roman republic?

He sacrificed Caesar for the good of Rome. He also sacrificed himself because he did not want to see Rome turn into slaves under the power of Ocatavious.


What is the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman Emperor?

The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.


How would law help guarantee a persons rights under roman law?

Roman law was based on the concept of citizenship rights. It conferred rights and provided protections for Roman citizens .


Was the geographic extent of the Roman Empire established during the Republic?

Under the Republic, the Roman Empire annexed Sicily and Sardinia, along with many other provinces.


Which of these statements about the lives of African slaves in America is true?

Killing your own slaves was not a crime.


What were some of the rights that citizen under roman law?

There is a link below to a description of rights of Romans.


What were rights that some citizens enjoyed under the roman law?

There is a link below to a description of rights of Romans.