Admissible as evidence
Your mode of dress is not admissible in court. The evidence cries to be admissible, your honor!
Hearsay
The common law doctrine known as the "Ferreira Rule" allows for evidence from bloodhounds to be admissible in American courts. Bloodhound evidence is typically used in tracking and search operations to assist in identifying suspects or locating missing persons.
The evidence was not admissible in court due to it having no relevance to the proceedings.
AA meetings can be admissible in court. If they are court ordered or relevant to an issue or evidence, then it usually is admissible.
Evidence produced by a specific event oraction; important in crime scene reconstruction and in determining the set of circumstances or sequence within a particular eventAnother View: Conditional Admissibility is the evidentiary rule that when a piece of evidence is not itself admissible, but is admissible if certain other facts make it relevant.Such evidence becomes admissible on condition that counsel later introduce the connecting facts. If counsel does not, or cannot, satisfy this condition, the opponent may ask the judge to strike from the record the conditionally admitted piece of evidence and to instruct the jury to disregard it
In a court of law the only evidence that can be admissible must be gotten legally.
Not at all. If a document is not admissible in evidence, than the question of admissibality not arise...
As a general rule, no, they are not. HOWEVER, 'coercion' needs to be further defined to know whether or not it meets the legal threshhold.
no
Yes.