answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What should be the steps or legal terms taken by madhya pradesh India government on marriage?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why should America support same-sex marriage?

America should support same-sex marriage because its system of government is based upon equality and personal freedom.


Why should andhra pradesh be divided?

no because it will be difficult for Andhra pradesh for seperating state


Should Andhra Pradesh be divided?

no


Should you support same-sex marriage?

If you wish to. Unless there is a prohibition where you live, in which case it would be against the law.Alternate Viewpoint:Yes, you should support same-sex marriage because the government has no legitimate interest in limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples.


Why do some governments prohibit same-sex marriage?

OpinionThe government prohibits gay marriage because the think that it is wrong. they think that the same sexes should not be allowed to get married.OpinionSome governments are opposed to same sex marriage due to aggressive intrusion by religious groups into government.


Should people accept same-sex marriage?

Yes, people should accept same-sex marriage because the government has no legitimate interest in limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples only. In places where same-sex marriage has been legalized, continuing to oppose it personally is an unavailing attitude.


What is Barack Obama's position on the issue on same-sex marriage?

He favors marriage equality, believes states should decide for themselves and that the federal government should recognize all marriages, not just heterosexual ones.


Can my fiance come to married in cambodia with my and he visits only1 week can we apply married to embassy US?

You should approach the US embassy for accurate information or just register your marriage with the Cambodia government. The marriage will be recognized by the US government.


Why Hindi should be a national language?

It is the most spoken languag. It is spoken as a main language in bihar, UP, rajastan, new Delhi, himanchal pradesh, uttarkhand,madhya pradesh, Haryana. It is a second language in Punjab, gujarat, west Bengal,orrisa, Assam, Manipur, Mizoram, Nagaland, Sikkim, Tripura, Jammu and Kashmir Also it is spoken in Nepal, Fiji, Mauritius, Seychelles, Bhutan, Guyana, Suriname, Singapore, trinidad and Tobago, Barbados, UAE and Bahrain


Why do libertarians support same-sex marriage?

Libertarians believe the government should not be telling people whom they can and cannot marry.


What incentives might the government offer to convince people to have smaller families?

During the past few years Haryana and Rajasthan have passed laws that prospectively debar persons who do not adopt the two-child norm from contesting elections for Panchayats, Zilla Parishads and Nagarpalikas. The Population Policy of Madhya Pradesh states that " persons having more than two children after January 26, 2001 would not be eligible for contesting elections for panchayats, local bodies, mandis or cooperatives in the state. In case they get elected, and in the meantime they have the third child, they would be disqualified for that post". The policy of Rajasthan proposes " legal registration of marriage", compulsory observance of minimum age at marriage for availing of "government facilities and services" and "stiffer penal provisions for violation of the legal age at marriage". Madhya Pradesh also lays down that "from January 26, 2001, persons marrying before legal age at marriage will not be eligible to seek government employment in Madhya Pradesh". The legal age at marriage is made a criterion for those seeking jobs especially public jobs, getting admission in educational institutions, applying for loans, etc. in some States. The case of raising the age of marriage is certainly undeniable. The linking of family size to the right to contest elections is presumed to demonstrate a degree of political commitment that is considered essential. The argument that it would adversely affect the interests of women or the disadvantaged sections of society does not seem convincing, particularly in a setting when people themselves have realized the need to regulate family size. There is also a demand that such disqualifications should be extended to the Members of Legislative Assemblies and Parliament also.INCENTIVES AND DISINCENTIVES AS RECOMMENDED BY THE NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL (NDC) COMMITTEE ON POPULATION (1992)The Committee recommended to appropriately modify the incentives/ disincentives applicable to employees of Central/State/UT Governments, Autonomous Bodies, and Public Sector Undertakings etc. for adopting small family norm as follows:Leave Travel Concessions, free or concessional rail / bus or air journeys wherever applicable, CGHS facilities / reimbursement of medical expenses, Maternity Leave benefit (excluding those directly affecting the health of the pregnant mother and foetus/new born), etc. are made available up to two children only.Special increments for undergoing sterilization, incentive of lower rate of interest for house holding advances, interest bearing advances viz. vehicle loans should be available to the employees with two or less children only.Priority in allotment of Government accommodation is given to employees who have adopted 2-child norm.Any public servant violating the Child Marriage Restraint Act or who has more than 2 children should be debarred from promotion for a period of five years and birth of child beyond three should result in dismissal from service.Persons violating the child Marriage Restraint Act or having more than 2 children may be debarred from recruitment in the Government/Autonomous Bodies/Public Sector Undertakings.


What are the opinions of the government and a majority of citizens concerning same-sex marriage?

With respect to the United States of America, the answer to that question is: that states should be able to decide the issue for themselves and that the federal government should recognize all marriages.