none what so ever so they need to stop
cures and treatments most don't hurt animals because Craig foster said so
All medication has been animal tested...
Yes because if scientists did not do it on animals there would not be any cures.
Treatments, yes. Please see the Related question below. There are no known cures for Spina Bifida.
Animal testing helps to cure diseases and to discover new cures and vaccines for both, animals AND humans. It is totally normal that humans use animals to test on because we use nature for our own health. However, animal testing used for cosmetics is completely cruel and unnecessary.
Animal Testing is a part of animal abuse. 1. Cures and diseases have been made to save human lives. Treatments to diabetes, cancer, aids, etc. would not be available if it were not for animal testing. 2. Many things that have been discovered through animal testing also benefit other animals, and not just humans. 3. Most animal testing doesn't hurt the animal. Behavior experiments are often all that happens, and the animal gets a treat for doing something very easy like pressing a button. 4. There are institutional review boards that oversee testing to ensure that the animals are treated as well as possible. If you have any more suggestions of how animal abuse is good, please edit and add more topics of animal abuse and more numbers of how it is good. I personally think animal is never good. It involves unnecessary cruelty to innocent living creatures.
Redisssue does not seem to be an illness disease or condition that is listed by any website that is indexed. Therefore it is difficult to say what the cures or treatments might be.
There are many common treatments and cures for those who suffer from insomnia. Some treatments and cures for insomnia include changing one's sleep habits, limiting caffeine, and associating the bed only with sleep.
Animal testing is used to help find cures and treatments for common human ailments and diseases. So the banning of animal testing should increase human suffering. This is a "pro" if you believe human suffering is a good thing. Doctors practice medical procedures on animals before the practice on people. New techniques are often first performed on a handful of animals. Without animal testing, doctors would be forced to practice on people. We could probably find some poor people willing to be tested. This would help reduce poverty, either if they died or were handsomely paid for their participation. Another "pro."
there is no cure for huntington's disease
I haven't done any applied research with animal testing, although I have done basic research with them in the past. However, every drug and medication that is on the market today has had animal testing. Antibiotics, Pain Meds, Heart Meds, etc. Certainly animal research also includes basic research and not every test will result in a marketable drug.
No I am a non believer in animal abuse however many medicines have been modified and many cures for diseases have been created due to the testing of medicine on animals