Want this question answered?
No. Political parties are not even mentioned in the Constitution. In fact, the first President, George Washington, warned against factions and parties as being injurious to the nation.
The first political parties were the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans. Anti-federalists was not a party but rather a faction of U.S. politics and existed when the Constitution was ratified. They came into affect after the dispute over the National Bank. Hamilton, Secretary of Treasury, wanted to create a National Bank in order to create currency and stimulate business (being called the trickle down). Jefferson, Secretary of State, argued that the Constitution didn't authorize such financial control. This argument led to the formation of parties. The Federalist and the Democratic-Republicans a.k.a. (Jeffersonians or just Republicans)
With political parties, people often vote for the party, not the politician. With political parties, you also have more "group think", which can result in laws being passed just because a political party is pushing it, and not so much because it is a good idea. When a political party gets the super majority, they pass laws as quickly as possibly in an effort to initiate their political ideals. This means that laws end up being passed without any real scrutiny. It causes an instability in the government, results in inefficient laws, laws that don't represent the people, and government waste.
If you mean: was the voting not connected to any political parties, the answer is: no, it wasn't. Political parties like the Democrats and the Republicans only came into being several decades later.
It's important for political parties to have a majority in both the legislative houses, because America parties have become extremely partisan. Members of Congress are more likely to vote along with their party's political views rather than whether or not a bill is actually good for the country. They also tend to vote the opposite of the rival party, except in very rare cases. As a result, a majority in both houses, can lead to all that party's political bills being passed.
No. Political parties are not even mentioned in the Constitution. In fact, the first President, George Washington, warned against factions and parties as being injurious to the nation.
It does not. A two Party system is no where to be found in the Constitution. The two party system was created by the Founding Fathers as a way of organizing people with like minded ideals, and as a way to get political power. The first two parties being the Federalists and the Democrat-Republicans
George Washington felt that political parties were dangerous for the country. He explained in his farewell speech that political parties could cause people to end up being more loyal to the party than to the nation.
Thomas Jefferson was not present at the First Consititutional Congress, where the present day United States Constitution was drafted and written, he was in Paris. He is credited for being the main author of the Declaration of Independence
They have not been written according to the will and direct involvement of the people. These constitution, being written to suit the interest of the rulers which did not address the will, aspiration and feelings of the general public. This state of political instability resulted to political instability and social chaos.
It is democratic, with main parties being congress, B.J.p. and Communist.
The first political parties were the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans. Anti-federalists was not a party but rather a faction of U.S. politics and existed when the Constitution was ratified. They came into affect after the dispute over the National Bank. Hamilton, Secretary of Treasury, wanted to create a National Bank in order to create currency and stimulate business (being called the trickle down). Jefferson, Secretary of State, argued that the Constitution didn't authorize such financial control. This argument led to the formation of parties. The Federalist and the Democratic-Republicans a.k.a. (Jeffersonians or just Republicans)
With political parties, people often vote for the party, not the politician. With political parties, you also have more "group think", which can result in laws being passed just because a political party is pushing it, and not so much because it is a good idea. When a political party gets the super majority, they pass laws as quickly as possibly in an effort to initiate their political ideals. This means that laws end up being passed without any real scrutiny. It causes an instability in the government, results in inefficient laws, laws that don't represent the people, and government waste.
congress do all kinds of things to help out the political parties by paying and doing their dirty work as in Brandon brake being the best dude in the world
Political parties have unified groups of people and helped them seek and achieve common goals. They help to offer voters choices. Just as people have a favorite sports team that they tend to favor, political parties give people something to identify with. Political parties tend to control who get what, where, when, and how much. Their major purpose for existence is to get people to elect their candidates. Political parties tend to attract people based on their performances and their political platforms. What the promise and what they accomplish while being in office largely determine which coalitions will affiliate with their party in the next elections. So even though elections between political parties can be heated they have served as a way for people to identify with government and best express their individual voice.
i think in Virginia
There are no formal qualifications for being the Governor of Ohio as written in the Ohio Constitution. There are, however, informal qualifications, such as being a resident of Ohio for x amount of years and probably having prior political or executive experience.