An Oligarchy = rule by the few.
Aristotle said that an Oligarchy was a degraded form of Aristocracy = rule by the best.
Sparta was a limited democracy - citizens in assembly voted on issues put before them but could not discuss or raise issues. Athens became a radical democracy where citizens in assembly raised, discussed and decided on issues.
Aristocracy (rule by the best people) if you wanted to flatter them, Oligarchy (rule by the few) if you were less enthusiastic.
Aristotle said Oligarchy was a degraded form of Aristocracy, Tyranny was a degraded form of Monarchy (rule by one), and Ochlocracy (mob power) was a degraded form of Democracy (people power), and those degradation were the natural course of events (humans being humans, that inevitably happened).
That form of government is described as an oligarchy.
PLUTOCRACY and OLIGARCHY are terms commonly used to describe a political system where governance by an elite cadre of wealthy individuals.
a government ruled by the wealthy
Yes, like any Pharaoh. They were the most wealthy in the land and were top of the government.
Yes and no. If you were a woman or slave you couldn't. Only free men could.
There is about 16,000 people that live in Ancient Greece. Greece has a little population.
Tripartite government has no meaning for the government of ancient Rome because they did not have anything like it. Rome had a bipartite government which consisted of the senate and the Roman people. S.P.Q.R. The Senate was the body that proposed the laws and the people, via the assemblies, passed the proposals into law. (At least that was the way it was supposed to work.) However they did have a "check and balance" type of system in the election of the tribunes, who were able to cast a veto on any proposal they considered negative.Tripartite government has no meaning for the government of ancient Rome because they did not have anything like it. Rome had a bipartite government which consisted of the senate and the Roman people. S.P.Q.R. The Senate was the body that proposed the laws and the people, via the assemblies, passed the proposals into law. (At least that was the way it was supposed to work.) However they did have a "check and balance" type of system in the election of the tribunes, who were able to cast a veto on any proposal they considered negative.Tripartite government has no meaning for the government of ancient Rome because they did not have anything like it. Rome had a bipartite government which consisted of the senate and the Roman people. S.P.Q.R. The Senate was the body that proposed the laws and the people, via the assemblies, passed the proposals into law. (At least that was the way it was supposed to work.) However they did have a "check and balance" type of system in the election of the tribunes, who were able to cast a veto on any proposal they considered negative.Tripartite government has no meaning for the government of ancient Rome because they did not have anything like it. Rome had a bipartite government which consisted of the senate and the Roman people. S.P.Q.R. The Senate was the body that proposed the laws and the people, via the assemblies, passed the proposals into law. (At least that was the way it was supposed to work.) However they did have a "check and balance" type of system in the election of the tribunes, who were able to cast a veto on any proposal they considered negative.Tripartite government has no meaning for the government of ancient Rome because they did not have anything like it. Rome had a bipartite government which consisted of the senate and the Roman people. S.P.Q.R. The Senate was the body that proposed the laws and the people, via the assemblies, passed the proposals into law. (At least that was the way it was supposed to work.) However they did have a "check and balance" type of system in the election of the tribunes, who were able to cast a veto on any proposal they considered negative.Tripartite government has no meaning for the government of ancient Rome because they did not have anything like it. Rome had a bipartite government which consisted of the senate and the Roman people. S.P.Q.R. The Senate was the body that proposed the laws and the people, via the assemblies, passed the proposals into law. (At least that was the way it was supposed to work.) However they did have a "check and balance" type of system in the election of the tribunes, who were able to cast a veto on any proposal they considered negative.Tripartite government has no meaning for the government of ancient Rome because they did not have anything like it. Rome had a bipartite government which consisted of the senate and the Roman people. S.P.Q.R. The Senate was the body that proposed the laws and the people, via the assemblies, passed the proposals into law. (At least that was the way it was supposed to work.) However they did have a "check and balance" type of system in the election of the tribunes, who were able to cast a veto on any proposal they considered negative.Tripartite government has no meaning for the government of ancient Rome because they did not have anything like it. Rome had a bipartite government which consisted of the senate and the Roman people. S.P.Q.R. The Senate was the body that proposed the laws and the people, via the assemblies, passed the proposals into law. (At least that was the way it was supposed to work.) However they did have a "check and balance" type of system in the election of the tribunes, who were able to cast a veto on any proposal they considered negative.Tripartite government has no meaning for the government of ancient Rome because they did not have anything like it. Rome had a bipartite government which consisted of the senate and the Roman people. S.P.Q.R. The Senate was the body that proposed the laws and the people, via the assemblies, passed the proposals into law. (At least that was the way it was supposed to work.) However they did have a "check and balance" type of system in the election of the tribunes, who were able to cast a veto on any proposal they considered negative.
Greece has both wealthy people and poor people. But many are middle class.
Oligarchy is government by the few. Plutocracy is government by the wealthy few.
The Mayan government was hierarchical in nature and headed by a King. Also high on the hierarchy were priests and other people who were educated and wealthy. Other people included the middle class that were able to rise to become "elites" and the commoners, who mainly consisted of farmers and laborers. Also considered commoners were slaves and servants.
limited. The people of Greece invented democracy
An oligarchy is a government controlled by a small group of wealthy landowners and corporate leaders.
The forms of government in ancient Greece tended to divide the people of Greece rather than unify them.
The senate
oligarchy
the chinese government and most other communistical countries
capitalism
Wealthy people of Rome were called Patricians. American Government class? Me too. Tcarver6
Cleisthens