pike men because the cavarly will get naled and it was a wall of spears
For the most part both sides in the US Civil War had the identical theories on cavalry combat. Civil War generals such as George B. McClellan, Henry W. Halleck emphasized the saber. West Point instructor, Dennis Hart Mahan held the same ideas. Of course cavalry was also vital in reconnaissance. Few commanders expected cavalry units to rely on firearms. The "saber and spurs" theory believed cavalry charges designed to break through enemy infantry lines was the best technique.
It was the formation with which the infantry units were formed in, in order to hold up and repulse the charges of the enemy cavalry units.
Pikemen are effective in forming defensive formations due to their long weapons, providing a strong deterrent against cavalry charges. They can also be deployed to create barriers or obstacles on the battlefield, limiting enemy movement. Additionally, pikemen can work in coordination with other infantry units to maximize their defensive capabilities.
No, most people didn't use bayonets in World War 2.
Mostly stopping charges when there was no time to reload, and in any eyeball-to-eyeball conflicts.
Hardly anywhere. Bayonets were originally developed as a infantryman's defence against cavalry charges. There were hardly any of those in WW I and soldiers quickly discovered that a long and heavy rifle with a long bayonet at the end was practically useless for close combat fighting against other infantry soldiers. So most soldiers decided to use it only as a knife. They often shortened it to make it more managable and used it as a tool, and - on rare occasions, since this was mainly a war of big guns and machine guns - as a sort of dagger in close combat. Although bayonets remained a fixture in infantry soldiers' standard weaponry kits for many decades afterwards and 'bayonet training' persisted in many armies'training schedules until the 1960s, WW I proved to be the end of the bayonet as an effective weapon.
Union cavalry charges did not alter the course of the Battle of Gettysburg. On the last day of the battle Union General H. Kilpatrick ordered two charges by the 1st West Virginia and 1st Vermont regiments against the extreme right flank of the Confederate army. The charges were difficult in that the horsemen had to deal with difficult terrain against well positioned Texan infantry and were repulsed. To place this in proper perspective, Union cavalry in the East in the first three years of the war totaled approximately 1,400 to 1,500 casualties when confronting Eastern forces of the Confederacy. This is a small piece of the Eastern Theater, and narrowed to a three year period. However, in studying the US Civil War, this detail helps explain certain segments of battlefield action.
Based on the success of calvary charges during the Mexican American War, military leaders on both sides of the US Civil War were of the opinion that tactical offensive charges by calvary units would be effective. There were enough successful calvary charges against infantry troops on both sides, to cause them to continue throughout the war. With that said, cavalry charges were not the backbone of plans for a successful battle. They were used with caution, but yes, they were a part of many battles.
Defensive trench warfare.
In the 1700s, wars were typically fought using armies that consisted of infantry, cavalry, and artillery. Infantry soldiers were the backbone of the army and fought on foot with muskets. Cavalry soldiers fought on horseback and were typically used for reconnaissance and charges. Artillery was used to bombard enemy positions with cannons. Battles were fought in open fields or fortified positions, and strategies such as flanking, sieges, and frontal assaults were commonly employed.
A Pikestaff is a an old fashioned weapon rather like a bayonet. It was made to be a very long spear for thrusting violently into the enemy. The deployment was two-handed and was used by infantry for attacking enemy soldiers in Cavalry charges. It wasn't a weapon for throwing like a spear, but more for stabbing. It sounds quite barbaric.
Machine guns made infantry bayonet charges obsolete and largely spelled the end of cavalry as the major force on the battlefield.