answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What was John F A Sanford's argument in the Dred Scott?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Was a slave who had once belonged to an army surgeon named John Emerson.?

dred scott


Who Was a slave who had once belonged to an army surgeon named John Emerson.?

dred scott


Who was Dred Scott's Master?

dred scotts master was dr. john Emerson


Who was John Emerson's slave?

Dred Scott.


What was dred scott's second master name?

Dr. John Emerson


Who was the army surgeon who was the owner of slave dred Scott?

John Emerson


How much did john Emerson pay for dred Scott?

2 dollars


Who was Dred Scott bought by?

U.S. Army Surgeon Dr. John Emerson


What was John C Breckinridge platform?

He stood for the Dred Scott Decision (for slaves).


Who was Dr John Emerson?

He was Dred Scott's owner and a U.S. army surgeon


Was the Chief Justice who presided at the trial of Dred Scott the slave who sued the government for his freedom.?

No, the Chief Justice who presided over the Dred Scott case was Roger B. Taney. Dred Scott was the slave who sued for his freedom based on his residence in free territories.


What did Dred Scott claim John Sanford did to him and his family?

First of all, John Sandford was not the original defendant in the case. The original defendant was Irene Emerson, Dred Scott's owner. John Sandford was Irene Emerson's brother, and acted on her behalf. As such, Dred Scott never claimed that John Sandford did anything to his family. Now as far as Irene Emerson goes, Dred Scott claimed that she was harming him and his family by not allowing them to be free, in violation of the Missouri Compromise. Scott's claim was that since he had lived in free states (namely, Illinois and Wisconsin Territory) where the Missouri Compromise outlawed slavery, that should have made him free.