Dred Scott couldn't be freed because he was a slave, and did not have the right to sue in an American court. He also ruled that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional.
He judged the case according to the original spirit of the Constitution. If a man's property is sacred, and slaves are property, then slavery is legal in every state of the Union.
According to Chief Justice Roger Taney's ruling on the Dred Scott case. Nothing is the answer. Dred Scott is just as much property as a mule.
Yes, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney presided over the Dred Scott v. Sandford case. Dred Scott was the slave who sued for his freedom in this landmark 1857 Supreme Court decision. Taneyβs ruling infamously declared that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not U.S. citizens and could not sue in federal court.
The chief justice in the Dred Scott case was Roger B. Taney.
Roger Taney
Chief Justice Roger B. Taney.
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court when Dred Scott decision was made
Roger Taney
The Dred Scott decision electrified the the nation. chief justice Roger B. tanry said the Dred Scott was still a slave.
The Supreme Court ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford 1857 worsened sectional conflict by declaring that African Americans, whether enslaved or free, were not citizens and could not sue in the federal courts. This decision further entrenched divisions between the North and South over the issue of slavery and fed into the growing tensions that eventually led to the Civil War.
He was the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in the Dred Scott v. Sanford decision.
The ruling was is that he was a slave and not a citizen couldn't sue for his release from slavery.
Roger Scott has written: 'Downfall'