The answer here centers on ancient Rome's desire to gain wealth and power. The Roman Empire expanded because of the strength of its legions and its diplomacy. Rome had client States which provided Rome with wealth and Rome protected their client States from foreign invasion. The nations and areas it conquered with its military became targets for diplomacy. The leaders of what became Roman provinces were allowed a good deal of internal self control. And, as part of the empire gained protection from barbarians and rival empires such as the Parthian Empire. Roman influence and its civilization, in many cases provided order where there had been chaos. Roman law helped to stabilize some of its conquests.
History shows us that ancient empires before the Roman Empire, such as the Egyptian Empire, and the brief empire of Alexander the Great had the same goals. Egyptian Pharaohs fought wars against other ancient powers in the middle east region of the Mediterranean Sea. Alexander the great's goal of conquering the world (the known world at his time ) was based yes as a part of his nature for war but without the acquisition of power & wealth, his generals would have no incentive to simply conquer other nations for the sake of conquest alone. Some historians believe that Alexander also had plans to reduce the up and coming power of Rome.
The nature of empires is to gain power and wealth. It should be noted the the "modern' British Empire was a world wide enterprise. The old saying that the sun never set on the British empire was true. The British empire lasted well into the 20th century. It's last major colony of India became free at the end of WW2 & that was partly due to the weakness that the war brought to her empire.
The "modern" French empire lasted well into the 20th century as well. Frances largest colony, Algeria, gained its freedom after a long bitter struggle in 1962.
The UK gave up Hong Kong in 1999 I believe.
To summerize, all empires exist (ed) for the power & wealth that came with overpowering another nation either by force of arms or the threat of it. Rome was hardly alone with the characteristics of empire, from ancient times to modern times.
The Roman emperors were not different from the emperors and kings of antiquity and the Middle Ages. Personal rules used art to display their wealth and status and help legitimise of strengthen their image of power by creating artistic symbols for their power. It was often a matter of propaganda. Power and wealth was what patronised the arts. This was not limited to personal rulers. Members of the aristocracies and the wealthy middle classes did the same. This is one of the reasons why there was so much art of the Italian Renaissance. There were plenty of personal rulers, aristocrats and wealthy merchants and bankers in the Italian city-states who wanted to display their wealth and create symbolism for their power.
Roman Wealth
The wealth and power of city-states was based on its good trading.
Augustus brought the Pax Romana and all its benefits. Caligula did not bring any asset to the empire during his reign, but brought a sinister precedent by his death. He was the first emperor to be assassinated by the Praetorian Guard, thus giving the Guard a dangerous realization of its power. Nero was extremely popular with the common people. He, not only made technological advances but was the first emperor to use the dome in a building.
The Roman emperor who was in power at the time of the disaster in Pompeii was Titus.The Roman emperor who was in power at the time of the disaster in Pompeii was Titus.The Roman emperor who was in power at the time of the disaster in Pompeii was Titus.The Roman emperor who was in power at the time of the disaster in Pompeii was Titus.The Roman emperor who was in power at the time of the disaster in Pompeii was Titus.The Roman emperor who was in power at the time of the disaster in Pompeii was Titus.The Roman emperor who was in power at the time of the disaster in Pompeii was Titus.The Roman emperor who was in power at the time of the disaster in Pompeii was Titus.The Roman emperor who was in power at the time of the disaster in Pompeii was Titus.
The patricians were an ancient Roman social class. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy class with the power that their wealth brought them.The patricians were an ancient Roman social class. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy class with the power that their wealth brought them.The patricians were an ancient Roman social class. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy class with the power that their wealth brought them.The patricians were an ancient Roman social class. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy class with the power that their wealth brought them.The patricians were an ancient Roman social class. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy class with the power that their wealth brought them.The patricians were an ancient Roman social class. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy class with the power that their wealth brought them.The patricians were an ancient Roman social class. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy class with the power that their wealth brought them.The patricians were an ancient Roman social class. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy class with the power that their wealth brought them.The patricians were an ancient Roman social class. At the beginning of the city they were the wealthy class with the power that their wealth brought them.
Hades/Pluto has power over the Underworld and all that reside there. The power over death, and souls. He is also a God of riches and wealth.
Hades/Pluto has power over the Underworld and all that reside there. The power over death, and souls. He is also a God of riches and wealth.
There is no typical Roman house. Roman houses, like our present day houses, came in all sizes. The size depended upon the owner's wealth, just as today. One thing striking about the Roman houses was the size of their rooms, which were small by our standards, in particular the bedrooms and offices.There is no typical Roman house. Roman houses, like our present day houses, came in all sizes. The size depended upon the owner's wealth, just as today. One thing striking about the Roman houses was the size of their rooms, which were small by our standards, in particular the bedrooms and offices.There is no typical Roman house. Roman houses, like our present day houses, came in all sizes. The size depended upon the owner's wealth, just as today. One thing striking about the Roman houses was the size of their rooms, which were small by our standards, in particular the bedrooms and offices.There is no typical Roman house. Roman houses, like our present day houses, came in all sizes. The size depended upon the owner's wealth, just as today. One thing striking about the Roman houses was the size of their rooms, which were small by our standards, in particular the bedrooms and offices.There is no typical Roman house. Roman houses, like our present day houses, came in all sizes. The size depended upon the owner's wealth, just as today. One thing striking about the Roman houses was the size of their rooms, which were small by our standards, in particular the bedrooms and offices.There is no typical Roman house. Roman houses, like our present day houses, came in all sizes. The size depended upon the owner's wealth, just as today. One thing striking about the Roman houses was the size of their rooms, which were small by our standards, in particular the bedrooms and offices.There is no typical Roman house. Roman houses, like our present day houses, came in all sizes. The size depended upon the owner's wealth, just as today. One thing striking about the Roman houses was the size of their rooms, which were small by our standards, in particular the bedrooms and offices.There is no typical Roman house. Roman houses, like our present day houses, came in all sizes. The size depended upon the owner's wealth, just as today. One thing striking about the Roman houses was the size of their rooms, which were small by our standards, in particular the bedrooms and offices.There is no typical Roman house. Roman houses, like our present day houses, came in all sizes. The size depended upon the owner's wealth, just as today. One thing striking about the Roman houses was the size of their rooms, which were small by our standards, in particular the bedrooms and offices.
Antony killed himself as a matter of honor. He had lost the war and his bid for supreme power and in those circumstances, suicide was an honorable thing for a Roman to do.Antony killed himself as a matter of honor. He had lost the war and his bid for supreme power and in those circumstances, suicide was an honorable thing for a Roman to do.Antony killed himself as a matter of honor. He had lost the war and his bid for supreme power and in those circumstances, suicide was an honorable thing for a Roman to do.Antony killed himself as a matter of honor. He had lost the war and his bid for supreme power and in those circumstances, suicide was an honorable thing for a Roman to do.Antony killed himself as a matter of honor. He had lost the war and his bid for supreme power and in those circumstances, suicide was an honorable thing for a Roman to do.Antony killed himself as a matter of honor. He had lost the war and his bid for supreme power and in those circumstances, suicide was an honorable thing for a Roman to do.Antony killed himself as a matter of honor. He had lost the war and his bid for supreme power and in those circumstances, suicide was an honorable thing for a Roman to do.Antony killed himself as a matter of honor. He had lost the war and his bid for supreme power and in those circumstances, suicide was an honorable thing for a Roman to do.Antony killed himself as a matter of honor. He had lost the war and his bid for supreme power and in those circumstances, suicide was an honorable thing for a Roman to do.
Wealth and power. With wealth comes power. What other reason is there?
Wealth is interchangeable with power. Power is the ability to make things happen.
Wealth.
To indicate wealth and status
Wealth and Power - 2000 was released on: USA: 2000
The Roman emperors were not different from the emperors and kings of antiquity and the Middle Ages. Personal rules used art to display their wealth and status and help legitimise of strengthen their image of power by creating artistic symbols for their power. It was often a matter of propaganda. Power and wealth was what patronised the arts. This was not limited to personal rulers. Members of the aristocracies and the wealthy middle classes did the same. This is one of the reasons why there was so much art of the Italian Renaissance. There were plenty of personal rulers, aristocrats and wealthy merchants and bankers in the Italian city-states who wanted to display their wealth and create symbolism for their power.
Roman Wealth