0
What was not intended by jeffersonian republicans to address what they perceived as bad federalists policy?
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What was intended by Republicans of the Jeffersonian era to address what they perceived as bad Federalist policy?
Lousiana Purchase
What was not intended by Republicans of the Jeffersonian era to address what they perceived as bad Federalist policy?
The LA purchase
What was not intended by Jeffersonian Republicans to address what the perceived as bad federalist policy?
Expanding the size of the country
What laws were intended to counter what the federalists perceived as a growing threat to the peace and safety of the US?
These laws were intended to counter what the Federalists perceived as a growing threat to the peace and safety of the United States.
What is perceived quality?
The customer's perception of the overall quality or superiority of a product or service with respect to its intended purpose, relative to alternatives. Perceived quality is a perception by customers.
What amendment of the bill of rights was intended to address the concerns of the anti federalists?
I'd say all of the amendments of the Bill of Rights were intended to address the concerns of the Anti-Federalists since all directed toward the Federal Government and intended to limit its powers and behavior. But, in particular, the 10th specifically addressed States Rights. This is now an amendment that no longer has meaning.
Why was Thomas Jefferson's election in 1800 considered a republican revolution?
It represented the first peaceful transfer of power between political parties (in this case the Jeffersonian Republicans displaced the Federalists). It was intended that in a republican society changes in power(technically a revolution) would be determined by the votes of the people as opposed to the old standard of war. The American Constitution gave the people the power to change all of their leaders simply by voting in an election. In nearly every other country, turning out the leaders required a violent revolt at that time. The elections that we take for granted were a fantastic new thing at the time the Constitution was created.
What was the real motive behind Marbury v Madison?
This case was really a political case, a case of politics, testing the limits of the new government. Thomas Jefferson called the decision a defeat of the very limitation of powers the constitution was intended for, making the Judiciary the most powerful force in government and the most vulnerable to corruption. The long version is: The Federalists and Republicans were in a fight over control of the government, the federalists were a majority for the first two presidents but lost to the republicans for the third (Thomas Jefferson). The Federalists had stacked the courts, through appointments for life, with federalists (thereby finding a loophole in the constitution), but at least one of these appointments was not delivered (William Marbury's appointment). The court ruled that Marbury's appointment should have been delivered, but also ruled that the act was void to start with. This essentially entrenched the court with life long appointments of political control, a loophole that even today still exists in the Judiciary of the United States because citizens of the United States have no say or control over their appointments for life.
How did the federalists and anti-federalists settle their differences?
The Federalists wished to grant some definite power to the new American government, which would enable them to manage their own affairs without having to beg the various states to go along. The anti-Federalists feared that the government might use its powers to eliminate the liberties of the people. They finally agreed on a Bill of Rights, incorporated into the Constitution itself. The Federalists had protested that since the Constitution didn't give the Federal government power to perform some actions, that the government wouldn't be able to do that; the anti-Federalists wanted explicit guarantees. So the Anti-federalists gained specific rights for the people, rights that the Federalists had said were never in any danger. History has proven that the Anti-Federalists were correct, and the Federalists were naive in the extreme; government ALWAYS gathers more powers than its founders had intended.
How did Jefferson try to calm federalists fears to republican rule?
Jefferson made a speech at his inauguration to try and calm the fears of the federalists. He said that everyone was a republican and everyone was a federalists.
Why did democraticf republicans oppose the alien and sedition acts?
The Democratic-Republicans believed the Sedition Act was intended to stifle dissent. The Alien Act was believed to target one man.
Is knottsie a racist comment?
It is a political and racial slur, intended to deride someone based on race and perceived bias. The proper spelling is Nazi, from the early 20th century regime in Germany/Deutschland.
