Want this question answered?
Disease. They had no immunity to diseases brought to their lands.
Disease. They had no immunity to diseases brought to their lands.
Statistically, no.
Both are potentially dangerous, and are very much so when used improperly. Of the two, guns probably would be more so, but it's really comparing apples and oranges.
yes because we are apes and we have guns
Hitler because A. more charisma to lead his people and B. he has guns
Guns are not dangerous they are tools. People and the users are.
Don't you mean more dangerous than guns? Well, cars are bigger, so they have more potential energy. If that potential energy is released, then it could kill some one. If there was a gun as big as a car... Things would change.
machine guns were basically used the same way as they are now, but far more dangerous. At the squeeze of a trigger they could fire 500 to 1000 rounds per minute
It all depends on the rider,yes there all dangerous(Atc,atv,dirt bike) but you need experience to ride an Atc a quad is more easier for the fact that it has 4 wheels its like asking a question about guns are they dangerous of course they are! But it all depends on the persona holding it
There are no longer any Australian indigenous people (Aborigines) living a traditional native lifestyle in Australian rainforests.
More dangerous Most dangerous