Hi Chris As far as I know - my knowledge in the field is hardly exhaustive - it was Japan herself who launched the idea of a "new Order" in Asia. In the propagating of this new order they utilised resentment against European and American colonisation of Asia. Propaganda posters displayed the Japanese as liberators, and all whites as evicted oppressors. Asians are often portrayed as a homogenous group, thus perhaps a brotherhood of sorts. From the outset, this propaganda effort had a major problem - the sender. The Japanese were since medieval times a nowhere very loved people, and asians tended to resented them at least as much as they resented westerners. There were numerous other problems. Western nations usually had ethnic or social minorities in the colonies who were quite dependent on their protection against majorities. White rule was usually based on the collaboration of such minorities ("divide and conquer"). These groups were not particularly interested in anticolonisalism arguments. In fact they had every reason to fear the departure of the whites. In some cases, such as the Philippines, religion became an issue (and at any rate, the Filipinos had no tradition of positive relations with the Japanese even before Spanish and then US colonisation). But, occasionally there were successes. Local movements were either inspired by these ideas (and the Japanese humiliation of white armed forces, showing it was possible to resist successfully), or simply used the Japanese as a mean to obtain an independence already desired. These successes were largely destroyed by the Japanese themselves, as they did not really offer independence and liberation, but simply change of oppressor, which was soon made evident. Hope that helps some Tommy
The US bombed Japan to elliminate the leader of japan
Pre-war Japan was mostly interested in countries that could provide them with raw materials and oil, which Japan did not have and which it needed for its industrial and military expansion. So that meant: Manchuria and China and the surrounding south-east Asian countries, the Dutch East Indies and the Philippines.
japan
Mt Fuji is in Japan, on the island of Honshu.
Territorial expansion.
The US bombed Japan to elliminate the leader of japan
Yes. Japan is considered an Asian country
Pre-war Japan was mostly interested in countries that could provide them with raw materials and oil, which Japan did not have and which it needed for its industrial and military expansion. So that meant: Manchuria and China and the surrounding south-east Asian countries, the Dutch East Indies and the Philippines.
Yes, it depends if Japan trusts in Asian
If you consider Russia an Asian country then Russia is the Asian country nearest Alaska. China would be the next closest Asian country. And if you consider Japan, a country not on the Asian continent, Japan might be closer than China is to Alaska
Asian.
japan had little resources
Japan took part in the World War while America was in its expansion era
India hosted the first Asian games.
asian
Japan took part in the World War while America was in its expansion era
They wanted their oil and other resources that were not on the Japan islands. They also wanted to be the rulers of the Asian world.