The south treated their slaves much more fairly than the deep southern states. (South example: North Carolina) (Deep South example: Georgia, South Carolina) Maryland treated their slave fairly, and they were considered a northern state.
The North was against slavery, while the South supported slavery.
Yes?
Easiest answer is slavery. There were many issues dividing north and south, but it was the issue of slavery that was the most irreconcilable. Also, it is very doubtful that the population of the north would have endured a costly and bloody war with the south if not for the moral outrage caused by the practice of slavery in the southern states. In other words, if the southern states had seceded over tariffs or overreaching federal land grabs, I doubt the northern states could have persuaded their own citizens to fight and dies to preserve the union. Only opposition to slavery on moral and religious grounds gave the Union the political will to fight the war.
1.economic and social differences between the north and south 2. states rights vs. federal rights 3.fight between pro-slavery and abolition 4.growth of the abolition movement 5.the election of 1980-Abraham Lincoln
Primarily Ho Chi Minh (North) vs Diem then later Ky (South).
The principal long range cause of the US Civil War was slavery. Had slavery not existed in the US, the secondary issue of states' rights vs. Federal authority would never have reached the point of secession.
The major affect of the Civil War was it allowed black men and women to be free from slavery.It was the South, who were fighting to leave the Union to keep their slaves, VS the North who wanted to keep the South in the Union and free all African-Americans from slavery.Obviously, the North won, and we are were we are today.
Man vs- Wild - 2006 The Deep South was released on: USA: 27 August 2008
North was against slavery, and south wanted more slavery. south wanted more slavery so they could work on the cotton fields. if more people work on cotton fields the south would have more money.
The body of water the union (North)controlledfor keepingKentuckywas the Ohio River.By the way, this is happening in thebeginningof the Civil War (North vs. South) (NON SLAVERY VS. SLAVERY)
There was this tension, because the territories claimed by the South became slave territories and the territories claimed by the North became free territories. The North wanted no slavery and the South wanted slaves. So, the North and south raced to get as much land as possible to cause the other direction ( N. or S. ) to submit into slavery or no slavery
As in the American Civil War? Slavery and Federal vs States rights (i.e the role of government)
The reliance on cotton production and slavery in the South led to economic prosperity due to the profitability of cotton, but it also entrenched the region's dependence on slave labor. Socially, it created a hierarchical society based on race and entrenched racial inequalities. Morally, it led to widespread acceptance of the dehumanization of enslaved individuals and perpetuated the idea of white supremacy.
Lower parts of the body vs. upper parts of the body, e.g. arms(upper), legs(lower).
North VN vs South VN.
The Civil War was really all about slavery. The South wanted slavery to continue, and generally the North wanted slavery to end. However, from the South's point of view the Civil War was all about states rights versus federal government rights. The South wanted the states to have more rights and therefore more power than the federal government. The North generally wanted the federal government to have more rights and therefore more power than the states.
Easiest answer is slavery. There were many issues dividing north and south, but it was the issue of slavery that was the most irreconcilable. Also, it is very doubtful that the population of the north would have endured a costly and bloody war with the south if not for the moral outrage caused by the practice of slavery in the southern states. In other words, if the southern states had seceded over tariffs or overreaching federal land grabs, I doubt the northern states could have persuaded their own citizens to fight and dies to preserve the union. Only opposition to slavery on moral and religious grounds gave the Union the political will to fight the war.
slavery, econamy, sectionlaism, and federal vs. states rights
Because of slavery the southern states seceded from the northern states and the reason of the war was that the south wanted a government for every state , and the north wanted one single government