the plague had a massive effect on the people who lived there, this is because they had to leave their homes again after the plague. some peoples homes had to be blown up to help stop the fire. but there were some advantages like the fac t that the plague was wiped out and that the whole of London could be rebuilt in a more efficient way.
People that lived in San Francisco were affected many ways. Most of everyones life was destroyed, and they had many people homeless and out of work. Their was 225,000 injuries and 3,000 deaths. Their was also 400,000,000 dollars worth of property damage. Most people were in shock for a while.
Fire is often, but not always a secondary effect of earthquakes. If the earthquake strikes a populated area, it is likely to break natural gas pipes, and to cause other damage in human structures that will result in fires. In an unpopulated region, an earthquake may not cause a fire.
it harms our body very seriously.....it causes burns
Helium hasn't an effect.
fire does. ice needs to take time to effect your entire body.
500,000
Because only twelve people lived in London back then.
Mary you is a very special woman who saved the lives of over 30 people in the fire of london. She lived in the house next to where the fire started and saved the people in the street in which she lived.
The fire destroyed 13,200 houses, 87 churches, 1 cathedral and left an estimated 70,000 people homeless.
Samuel Peyps.
William Shakespeare lived from 1564 until 1616. The Great Fire of London was in 1666 so the answer to your question is 'no'.
there is a monument in London were the fire started
Yes. The fire of London did affect the people. This is because many people were killed but the fortunate ones' homes were burnt down and left homeless.
All their possessions were destroyed in the fire.
It burns them
It had killed many people their, because they had high population where the ring of fire was.
That lots of people died in the fire.