it was the fight between the state who wanted slavery and the state who didn't want slavery.
Most slave states left the union. The "border" states that practiced slavery, but stayed in the union, probably realized it would be too difficult to fight off the North.
it didnt
mason Dixon line
The goal was to keep a political balance between slave states and free states.
The "Border States" were slave states.
because they were single
The southern, slave states.
There was no agreement only the Civil War
The political balance between slave and free states as of 1819 was disturbed by the territory of Missouri's petition for admission to the Union as a slave state.
The fight between slave and non-slave state proponents in the early to mid-19th century in the United States was primarily over the expansion of slavery into new territories. Non-slave states wanted to limit the spread of slavery to preserve their economic and social systems, while slave states wanted to expand slavery to new territories to maintain political power and protect their economic interests. This conflict ultimately led to the Civil War.
Missouri's request for statehood touched off a sectional crisis between the northern, non-slave states and the south, slave holding states. The crisis was whether Missouri any states in general would become slave holding states or not.The promblems did Missouris request for statehood cause is Missouris request for statehood touched off a sectional crisis between the northern non-slave state and the south. Slave holding states. The crisis was wheather Missouri any states in general would become slave holding states or not.
The border between slave states and free states
1820
yes
yes
The slave states in between the Union (North) and the Confederates (South). The slave states are: Missouri, Kentucky, Maryland, Delaware, and West Virginia (joins later).
Most slave states left the union. The "border" states that practiced slavery, but stayed in the union, probably realized it would be too difficult to fight off the North.