They had more family farms, industry, fishing trades, and shipping. Slaves were not needed like they were on the huge plantations.
Southern Colonies had slaves to do their work on the plantation, Middle Colonies had some slaves but they were kinda in the middle, while the New England Colonies had no slaves.
gunpowder
The slave economy was more leaning on the South rather than the Middle and the New England Colonies.
well some had slaves and the new England colonies only had a few.
Many salve owners in the middle colonies would use either their fists or whips to beat slaves.
Southern Colonies had slaves to do their work on the plantation, Middle Colonies had some slaves but they were kinda in the middle, while the New England Colonies had no slaves.
They didn't trade for either. New England and middle colonies didn't have gold or slaves.
gunpowder
The slave economy was more leaning on the South rather than the Middle and the New England Colonies.
Barley any slaves.
Rum ;p
rum
There was more slaves in the southern colonies than in the Middle colonies and New England because they didn't think it was right to have slaves and they had mostly everything that they needed and could do it by themselves.REKLAWthe reasons why there were most slaves in the south than middle is because the southern economy ran on slavery,the souths depended on slavery to do the work which made them richer.the southern slaves had no freedom,but the north slaves could buy their way out of slavery and can only work on weekdays.
Rum ;p
Rum ;p
In the New England colonies, there were puritans. In the Southern colonies, there were debtors and slaves. In the Middle colonies, there were Quakers and Catholics.
They were to pay of debts from back in England. (old) They were housed. Furthermore, they were NOT forced to work like Slaves at the time.