Under the republic the Roman government consisted of five elected officials, the aedile, quaestor, praetor, consul and tribune of the plebs. Although each official had his specific duties, many times the duties overlapped. If, by empire, you mean the principate, (Rome was already an empire under the republic) the main power was vested in the person of the emperor, although the offices of the republican officials were kept.
The republic was run by a coalition of citizen assemblies and senate, the empire by a coalition of emperor and senate.
It began in Roman Empire. Plato has written in his treatise on Republic.
Probably because it was possible for everybody to vote. The USA's government was based off of the Roman republic.
Roman Empire Have fun cheating :P
The Roman Republic lasted from the time of the kings until the civil wars in the first century BCE. The first Roman ruler that we call an emperor was Gaius Octavius -- or Augustus -- who ruled from 27 BCE to 14 CE. He didn't call himself an emperor, but "princips" or "first citizen." For more information about the Roman Republic, check my website: www.judithgeary.com
The republic was run by a coalition of citizen assemblies and senate, the empire by a coalition of emperor and senate.
How shud i no
The Roman Empire started during the Roman Republic, that is under a republican government. The Republic was then replaced by the absolute rule by emperors.
The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.The Roman republic was a form of government and the Roman emperor was a man. If you mean the difference between the Roman republic and the Roman empire, there was no difference except in the form of government. Rome was already an empire under the republican form of government. When a single person took over leadership of that government, it became the principate or what is erroneously called the "empire". In both types of government, vast amounts of territory were ruled by a single authority, the senate under the republic and the "emperor" under the principate. Both the republic and the principate met the criteria for an empire.
The Roman and British empires were republics.
It began in Roman Empire. Plato has written in his treatise on Republic.
The Republic had citizens assemblies which voted on issues put by the senate. The Empire had the Princeps and Senate who governed in coalition without any direct input from the citizens.
They were different because they are two different things. An empire is a political conglomerate while a republic is a form of government. In the case of ancient Rome, the Roman empire was governed both as a republic and as a principate.They were different because they are two different things. An empire is a political conglomerate while a republic is a form of government. In the case of ancient Rome, the Roman empire was governed both as a republic and as a principate.They were different because they are two different things. An empire is a political conglomerate while a republic is a form of government. In the case of ancient Rome, the Roman empire was governed both as a republic and as a principate.They were different because they are two different things. An empire is a political conglomerate while a republic is a form of government. In the case of ancient Rome, the Roman empire was governed both as a republic and as a principate.They were different because they are two different things. An empire is a political conglomerate while a republic is a form of government. In the case of ancient Rome, the Roman empire was governed both as a republic and as a principate.They were different because they are two different things. An empire is a political conglomerate while a republic is a form of government. In the case of ancient Rome, the Roman empire was governed both as a republic and as a principate.They were different because they are two different things. An empire is a political conglomerate while a republic is a form of government. In the case of ancient Rome, the Roman empire was governed both as a republic and as a principate.They were different because they are two different things. An empire is a political conglomerate while a republic is a form of government. In the case of ancient Rome, the Roman empire was governed both as a republic and as a principate.They were different because they are two different things. An empire is a political conglomerate while a republic is a form of government. In the case of ancient Rome, the Roman empire was governed both as a republic and as a principate.
Probably because it was possible for everybody to vote. The USA's government was based off of the Roman republic.
unanswered
The Republic had citizens assemblies which voted on issues put by the senate. The Empire had the Princeps and Senate who governed in coalition without any direct input from the citizens.
Roman Empire Have fun cheating :P