White Southerners were delighted - it meant that slavery was legal in every state of the Union.
Those white Northerners who were Abolitionists were horrified, on account of the same verdict. Other white Northerners were simply alarmed that it was driving the two sides further apart, and bringing war closer.
African-Americans were, of course, not being consulted much. Some of them may have wondered why Scott did not claim his freedom earlier, when it would have been granted automatically.
Southerners were delighted with the Dred Scott decision, but northerners were outraged.
for them to have more fish in there lives.
While the Dred Scott decision, which ruled a slave as property could accompany his master to a free state yet still remain a slave pleased southerners, it greatly agitated northerners. The Raid on Harperâ??s Ferry by radical abolitionist, John Brown inflamed southerners. The two incidents drew sharp divisions between the north and south and paved the way to the American Civil War.
It greatly angered the Abolitionists - remembering that most Northerners were not Abolitionists by any means.
It appeared to mean that slavery was protected by the Constitution, and could not be banned from any state of the Union.
Southerners were delighted with the Dred Scott decision, but northerners were outraged.
Southerners were delighted with the Dred Scott decision, but northerners were outraged.
The Supreme Court decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford outraged Northerners because it ruled that African Americans could not be U.S. citizens and that Congress could not ban slavery in the territories. This decision was seen as a blow to the abolitionist movement and reinforced the perception that the federal government was siding with pro-slavery interests.
That place that were integrated were segregated.
for them to have more fish in there lives.
Southerners benefited the most from the Dred Scott Decision.
Southerners saw the Dred Scott decision as a victory because it upheld the rights of slaveholders to take their slaves into any state or territory, regardless of whether slavery was legal there. The decision also declared that African Americans, whether free or enslaved, were not American citizens and therefore could not sue in federal court, reinforcing the notion that they were property, not people.
Many Southerners supported the Dred Scott decision because it reinforced the rights of slaveholders to take their slaves into free territories. They viewed the decision as a victory for states' rights and property rights over federal power.
While the Dred Scott decision, which ruled a slave as property could accompany his master to a free state yet still remain a slave pleased southerners, it greatly agitated northerners. The Raid on Harperâ??s Ferry by radical abolitionist, John Brown inflamed southerners. The two incidents drew sharp divisions between the north and south and paved the way to the American Civil War.
The Dred Scott decision by the US Supreme Court weakened the case for those Americans that believed slavery had to be abolished. It strengthened the belief, held mostly in the South, that slavery was Constitutional. The South was elated, and Northerners who opposed slavery were shocked.
The Dred Scott decision declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional and ruled that slaves were property. The decision did not necessarily alarm most people in the North.
black and white southerners were legally segregated