for them to have more fish in there lives.
Southerners were delighted with the Dred Scott decision, but northerners were outraged.
It greatly angered the Abolitionists - remembering that most Northerners were not Abolitionists by any means.
It appeared to mean that slavery was protected by the Constitution, and could not be banned from any state of the Union.
Dred Scott is a slave and sued his slave owner that if his in the north his freed from slavery. dred scott decision is when they said the Dred is just a slave and they are not citizen had no rights to sue their slave owners. this led to continue the civil wars against the north and the south
They were unhappy about the death of Dred Scott and John Brown.
Southerners were delighted with the Dred Scott decision, but northerners were outraged.
Southerners were delighted with the Dred Scott decision, but northerners were outraged.
The Dred Scott decision declared the Missouri Compromise unconstitutional and ruled that slaves were property. The decision did not necessarily alarm most people in the North.
It greatly angered the Abolitionists - remembering that most Northerners were not Abolitionists by any means.
It appeared to mean that slavery was protected by the Constitution, and could not be banned from any state of the Union.
Southerners benefited the most from the Dred Scott Decision.
Stonewell Jackson thought Dred Scott Decision was a supid idea
The Dred Scott decision by the US Supreme Court weakened the case for those Americans that believed slavery had to be abolished. It strengthened the belief, held mostly in the South, that slavery was Constitutional. The South was elated, and Northerners who opposed slavery were shocked.
Dred Scott is a slave and sued his slave owner that if his in the north his freed from slavery. dred scott decision is when they said the Dred is just a slave and they are not citizen had no rights to sue their slave owners. this led to continue the civil wars against the north and the south
the dred scott decision stated that slaves are peoplealso and should'nt be property :D yurwelcomee
Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 US 393 (1857)
The Dred Scott decision electrified the the nation. chief justice Roger B. tanry said the Dred Scott was still a slave.