The Hamiltonian Federalist was an advocate for a strong central government. He favored a chief executive who would appoint state government, instead of allowing them to be elected by the citizens. Despite Hamilton's status as a Founding Father, and the actions that led to the War of Independence, he had stated that Britain had the best government in the world.
A federalist was an individual who was in favor of the adoption of the U.S. Constitution and the creation of a federal union with a strong central government. Federalism arose at the end of the civil war.
The federalists were in favor of the ratification of the constitution.
Federalists wanted to urge the Constitution to be in action, but the Anti-Federalists didn't want the Constitution to be in commencement. They were against it.
The main argument as to whether or not the Constitution should be ratified centered around the fact that it didn't contain a Bill of Rights. Federalists wanted a strong national government. Anti-federalists felt that without a Bill of Rights, the government would have too much power.
they wrote the federalists essays in which they pleaded their case
The main argument that was made in favor of the Bill of Rights was that it would guard against the emergence of a tyrannical government. The anti-Federalists, in particular, fought to have the Bill of Rights included in the Constitution.
For a strong national government
The argument of the Anti-Federalists was against a strong central government. They feared it would destroy the liberties Americans secured during the Revolutionary War.
The argument of the Anti-Federalists was against a strong central government. They feared it would destroy the liberties Americans secured during the Revolutionary War.
by loling
JUnio Agusto
The main argument that was made in favor of the Bill of Rights was that it would guard against the emergence of a tyrannical government. The anti-Federalists, in particular, fought to have the Bill of Rights included in the Constitution.
The main argument as to whether or not the Constitution should be ratified centered around the fact that it didn't contain a Bill of Rights. Federalists wanted a strong national government. Anti-federalists felt that without a Bill of Rights, the government would have too much power.
Theire main argument was that the Constitution binds the states much like England binded the states. In their eyes, why go back to be bound if they just fought a war to be free?