0
What were the outcomes of Bill Clinton's and Andrew Johnson's trials?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
In both cases they were acquitted and allowed to remain in office.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Wiki User
∙ 12y agoThey were both impeached by the US House of Representatives.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Which two presidents were impeached by the house what were the outcomes of their trials?
The only two presidents to have been impeached by the House are Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton. Both of the trials resulted in the president in question remaining in office, although Andrew Johnson remained in office by only one vote.
A probability is a ratio of a fraction in between?
If the outcomes of the trials are equally likely, then (and only then) is it the number of favourable outcomes and the total number of trials.
What is she binomial probability distribution is used with?
It is used when repeated trials are carried out , in which there are only two outcomes (success and failure) and the probability of success is a constant and is independent of the outcomes in other trials.
Can a binomial experiment be used to find the probability of 4 outcomes of .20 and 16?
If the question is about 4 successful outcomes out of 16 trials, when the probability of success in any single trial is 0.20 and independent of the outcomes of other trials, then the answer is, yes, the binomial experiment can be used.
What is the definition of empirical probability?
the ratio of the number favorable outcomes to the total number of trials.
What has the author Andrew Kerwick written?
Andrew Kerwick has written: 'A report of the trials of the Caravats and Shanavests'
How many favorable outcomes would be possible if the number of total possible outcomes is increased to 24?
The answer depends on what the trials are, what constitutes a favourable outcome, and how many possible outcomes there were previously. And since you have not bothered to provide these crucial bits of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer.The answer depends on what the trials are, what constitutes a favourable outcome, and how many possible outcomes there were previously. And since you have not bothered to provide these crucial bits of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer.The answer depends on what the trials are, what constitutes a favourable outcome, and how many possible outcomes there were previously. And since you have not bothered to provide these crucial bits of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer.The answer depends on what the trials are, what constitutes a favourable outcome, and how many possible outcomes there were previously. And since you have not bothered to provide these crucial bits of information, I cannot provide a more useful answer.
What is the meaning of critical and noncritical trials?
Critical trials are trials that evaluate the main objectives of a study, while non-critical trials are secondary or exploratory trials that may provide additional information but are not essential for the main study outcomes. Critical trials are typically pre-specified in a study protocol and have a higher impact on the overall study results compared to non-critical trials.
Activity in which outcomes can be used to estimate probility?
Assuming that probility is your failed attempt to spell probability, the activity is repeated trials whose outcomes are independent, identically distributed (iid) variables.
What is required in a binomial distribution?
A number of trials, each of which has only two outcomes: these are usually termed "success" and "failure". The trials must be independent and the probability of success must remain constant.
What president other than Andrew Jackson was in impeachment trials?
Bill Clinton.
What were the outcomes of the Nuremberg Trials?
The outcomes of the Nuremberg Trials included the condemnation of top Nazi officials for war crimes, crimes against humanity, and crimes against peace. Twelve defendants were sentenced to death, three were acquitted, and others received varying prison terms. The trials established the principle that individuals could be held accountable for committing atrocities under international law.
