The standard procedure is to admit your initial hypothesis turns out to be wrong and then proceed to explain why it was wrong and what really happened. Science is all about learning from your mistakes.
Scientist consider hypothesis to be an educated guess on what they are studying. If that scientist researches and experiments more, he will see if his hypothesis is true or false.
make a new hypothesis. if not the scientist continues believing in their hypothesis without any proof and becomes a mad scientist
If I was the scientist you would test is as soon as possible then just skip the hypothesis step
there is never really a wrong hypothesis because its basically just a guess....
the answer is the scientist designs a scientific inquiry
the hypothesis has not been proven wrong.
the hypothesis has not been proven wrong.
A hypothesis doesn't necessarily need to be correct. After a scientist has conducted an experiment and discovered that their hypothesis is incorrect, they still have gained the knowledge and the results from their experiment---as well as the correct answer, in some cases. They can use the results from the experiment that tested the original hypothesis to form a new experiment.
If you develop an experiment that truly demonstrates that the hypothesis is wrong*, then the hypothesis will lose its acceptance in the scientific community. * Such an experiment would have to be repeatable by other scientists AND accepted by interested scientists as a proof that the hypothesis is wrong.
Scientist consider hypothesis to be an educated guess on what they are studying. If that scientist researches and experiments more, he will see if his hypothesis is true or false.
a scientist can do another experiment or change their hypothesis.
A scientist needs to include the steps because the other scientists who are working with this scientist won't be able to see how they got the answer and just conclude that it's a hypothesis and get the wrong idea.
the scientist proposed a theory after hypothesis.
make a new hypothesis. if not the scientist continues believing in their hypothesis without any proof and becomes a mad scientist
Discard or change the hypothesis.
If I was the scientist you would test is as soon as possible then just skip the hypothesis step
If I was the scientist you would test is as soon as possible then just skip the hypothesis step