Colonization had many positive and negative effects on the country. If colonization never took place; those effects would have been absent. According to the opinions of historians and analysts, colonization was good in the sense that it brought economic development to countries at the expense of Another Country. For example, when South Africa was part of the British colony, the city of Cape Town had grown significantly. Labour was imported. Machinery was imported. Farms grew. Many mines appeared. South Africa began trading big with the rest of the world. More people from Britain settled in South Africa to start businesses. Thus cities grew larger and larger. But, who had benefited? There was no Reserve Bank of South Africa. The indigenous people were not educated to start businesses. They worked for the British. But, they had to buy food and other goods to survive. They bought from British owned shops and thus only the British made money to keep. Since the indigenous people started working in these industries, they had depended on money to survive and not hunting or subsistence farming. Thus their cultures were destroyed. These are but a few effects. Now think about the opposite. If South Africa was not colonized, there would be slow development. The indigenous people did not have the knowledge, skills or funds to open mines etc. They would not have had any income. They would have thus stuck to traditional ways to survive in their tribes by hunting etc. This is entirely based on opinion. Some people might have different views. It is what you make of it.
Undeveloped
noooooooooooooooo never in her life would she go to south Africa
If Spain wouldn't of colonized South American countries,they would have no spanihs languge or cultures
In ancient times, Russia consists of lands which were colonized by Vikings traveling up the river Rus. Again in history, much of Russia would be conquered and effectively colonized by the Mongols. Russia was never a colonial power.
you would never find this answer
The Dutch never had an Emperor and they never ruled in south Africa. the people that settled South Africa were of Dutch back ground but were not ruled through The Netherlands. Had this been the case the English would not have been game to rob them during the Boer war.
Ethiopia was never colonized, therefor, it's not independent Actually, if Ethiopia was not colonized, that would mean it remained independent. During the frequent colonizations of Africa, Italy tried to colonize Etyhiopia, but they fought and won, therefore maintaining their independence.
South Africa.
yes it would be likely, because you never know what a volcano will do
South Africa is a country so I would say South Africa has the highest Christian population in South Africa.
south africa to china
South Africa is geographically East-South-Easterly from the USA.
The scramble for Africa took place in the 19th century when South Africa was being colonized by European countries. The Europeans would go to war to try and gain the land, and when they won the natives had to keep moving (like a defence wall they were being pushed closer and closer to the center).