0
Answer 1
Wiped off the map. but Arab dictators are puppets of US and US is puppet of Zionists.
Arabs are different. Shia Muslims and not Shia Muslims. non Shia Arabs have shown that have no power against Israel and US. but not Shia Muslims. Shia Muslims have support from God and always many miracles happen in their wars and special angels come to help them in the wars even if the number of shia Muslims is very few in the wars (this is promised by God in Quran 3:125). Iran/Iraq (Saddam) war is another example of Shia Muslim wars. Karbala war is another example of Shia Muslim wars but this war was for saving the real Islam from being extincted and not for winning the physical war.
By only considering the Hezbollah small group power in the 33 days Hezbollah/Israel war it is enough to know the result. in this war Israel attacked Lebanon but Hezbollah had all the attack plan of Israel and so Israel defeated and for the first time in history asked cease fire in war (i.e. asked cease fire from Hezbollah). but most of western media who are friend with Israel tried to hide this defeat and even show it as victory.
Hezbollah calls Israel and US as terrorists and Israel and US call Hezbollah as terrorist.
Another reference is wars between Israel and Palestine Islamic Jihad group who are Shia Muslims mostly.
===========================
Answer #1.5 :
Answer #1 avoids reference to 1948, 1967, and 1973,
when Israel WAS attacked by the Arabs.
Answer 2
There is little question concerning what would happen if Israel was attacked by its Arab neighbors: defeat for the Arab attackers. It would probably be nearly as humiliating for the Arabs as 1967 if they attacked with the current state of affairs.
Historically, Israel defeated Arab attacks and belligerent activities in 1948-1949, 1967-1970, and 1973. Some of these Arab defeats (especially 1973) were repackaged by the Arab leaders as victories even though no major Arab goals were achieved and the armistices were signed as all Israeli positions were advancing.
If the question is asking about today, the Arabs would have even less of a shot than they did historically. Iraq, Syria, and Egypt, the strongest Arab belligerents against Israel in Israeli history have their own internal problems ranging from civil strife to civil war quagmire. If they cannot contain their own problems, they would be unable to launch a preemptive attack on Israel. Jordan has a very fruitful peace with Israel at the moment, which would deter attacks from them, aside from the fact that their army is not a match for Israel's. Lebanon only fought Israel in 1948 and was quickly defeated by Israel at that time. Additionally, the Lebanese were unable to protect Lebanon when Israel invaded in 2006. This would make it appear that the Lebanon could not launch a successful offensive against Israel. Militant Organizations like Hamas, Fatah, and Hezbollah have a better track-record against the Israeli Defense Forces, but all militant victories against Israel have occurred on that organization's home territory. This is because militant organizations rely on local networks and urban warfare to fight and retreat/hide quickly. Such methods of attack work well for defensive war, but are almost useless in offensive war. No militant group has ever scored a success on Israeli territory.
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who attacked the Arabs?
I assume because this question is in the World War I Category that you are referring to the Arab involvement in World War I. Arabs were not attacked in World War I, they rose up against the occupying Ottoman Empire. They attacked the Ottomans, who of course, retaliated. The British and French promised the Arabs that if they joined with the Allies against the Ottomans, that they would be compensated with an Arab State over all of the Middle East. Suffice it to say that they Arabs were not compensated in that way.
What were they trying to accomplish during the six-day war in the middle east?
It depends entirely on the "they". If "they" refers to the Arabs, they were trying to wipe Israel off of the map. If "they" refers to the Israelis, they were trying to effectively defend their country. Neither the Arabs nor Israel foresaw that the war would be such an incredibly lopsided conflict and that Israel would be so victorious.
Why is the Facebook Group West Bank - Israel Not Palestine made up only of Arabs?
The premise of the question is wrong, there are non-Arabs in the facebook group. As for the Arabs in the group, you would have to ask them what it is that they support. It is likely that they are pro-Israel and pro-peace and believe that giving Israel the West Bank is desirable. Additionally, the link to the Facebook group page has been moved to the Discussion Section.
What do Arabs expect from Israel?
This Question is not very clear, By "Arabs" you reffer to the Whole Arab world? Then one needs to ask "What Arabs expect from the Western Countries" As their agenda is not limited to Israel although you can say that Israel as being a non-Muslim Western styled country stands out in the midst of the Arab World who would prefer not to see it there. This is a "General Idea" of the reality that stands behind the current middle east events
What are local Arabs affected by the formation of israel called?
There is no general term for any Arab who was affected by the formation of Israel. Numerous Arabs were effected in numerous countries, some motivated to war, some motivated to flee, some who changed their opinions of Jews and so forth. If you referring to Arabs who abandoned their homes during the Jewish-Arab Engagement that occurred concurrently with Israel's Declaration of Independence, those would be retroactively called the Palestinians.
How did the Arabs view the recognition of Israel as a country?
Most Arabs and most Arab countries are opposed to the recognition of the State of Israel and have actively tried to persuade other countries to stop (or never begin) recognizing the State of Israel. They see recognizing Israel as legitimizing the existence of that country and most Arabs and Arab countries would immensely prefer that Israel is not in existence. Rather than make peace, have mutual recognition and increase trade in their countries, Arab leaders would rather harbor a belligerent attitude because it prevents their citizens from rising up against them.
Will palestine ever be free?
Well, chances are NO. Its because not even the United States cannot stop Israel from making illegal settlements in the west bank. However, it is expected that Muslims will make a majority in Israel (due to their large birth rates) by no later than 2048, so if that happens Arabs will be the majority in Israel and then turning Israel from a Jewish to an Arab state then possibly they would propose a confederation to make Palestine... who knows... The statistics quoted in the above answer do not account for religious Jews who are increasing at much the same rate as the Arabs. It is not likely that Arabs will be the majority in 1949 Israel for a much longer period of time.
What would happen if slaves attacked their masters?
Beat, break limbs, hanged by tree
How are people from Israel called?
Israeli is the common term. However, I know Israeli Arabs who would prefer to be called Palestinians, and before 1948, Jews from the region now known as Israel were known as Palestinian Jews.
Is US controlled by Israel?
No, of course not... but the US would like to control Israel with this new Obama administration. Hopefully that will not happen, and Israel will stand firm. No dividing Jerusalem.
Who bombed the uss liberty?
Israel's air force and navy attacked the USS Liberty in June 1967 while the ship was in international waters. Israel attacked and tried very hard to sink the intelligence eaves dropping ship so that the USA would not know about Israel's war strategy. Many US sailors died as a result of Israel's unprovoked attack the US naval ship. The USS Liberty managed to escaped destruction at the hands of Israel. LBJ said nothing to Israel about the incident, so he would not offend American Jewish Democrats.
What country are Arabs and Jews fighting for?
Answer 1After WWII and the Holocaust, peace treaties established that a Jewish nation would be established on the land the Jews had lived on for millenia (this is year 5763 on the Jewish calendar), so that there would be a Jewish homeland and the Jews would be able to go back "home" if God forbid another Holocaust occurred with attempts to "exterminate" the world's Jews. Arabs had also lived in areas of what is now Israel, and the Arabs that owned and lived on property within the borders were invited to become full citizens of the new, tiny, country. However, egged on by large surrounding Arab nations that didn't like the idea of a Jewish State, these landowners decided that they did not want to be part of a Jewish state, even though they would be perfectly free to practice their own religion and would be full citizens, and fled Israel. However, the same surrounding Arab countries did not actually wish to take these people into their own large countries - they knew that the only way to keep the displaced groups angry and upset would be for them not to have a homeland themselves. So these groups of former landowners, as well as poor Arabs who had not owned land to begin with, who fled the new country of Israel on their own accord, were not let into the large, surrounding Arab nations, and they had to be mad at someone - so they chose Israel. They did end up in a crappy position, but not because they couldn't have stayed and prospered in the new country of Israel, though most of the Arab population in the contentious areas has now been brainwashed to believe that it was Israel's fault that they left their land. Possibly ideally, a two-state solution would give the "Palestinians" their own country side by side with Israel, which has been proposed time and time again, but the Palestinians seem not to want "peace" - they want no Israel. When borders can be proposed that do not leave Israel with an inability to defend its own borders that it won in wars in which it was attacked, I believe that a two-state solution would be the best option to provide the Palestinians with a country to call their own, next to Israel, but they have to accept this, which would require them accepting Israel as a legitimate nation.Answer 2Jews and Arabs are fighting for the territory that once belonged to the British Mandate of Palestine. The Jews call this territory Israel and have established a country there. The Arabs call this territory Palestine and have attempted to establish a country in a minority of the land with limited success.
